Volvo XC60 MOT Results
Registered in 201684.1% pass rate
from 14,839 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo XC60 is unusually good or bad.
-
5.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(47% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.040% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Stop lamp (43% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.40% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.10% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.10% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.10% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.040% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.040% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.034% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.034% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.0067% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.0067% fail on Position lamp
-
0.0067% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.0067% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
(14% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth (21% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Size/type
-
3.7% fail on
Brakes
(33% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(73% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(99% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Brake pads (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Brake linings
-
0.36% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.36% fail on Brake discs
- 0.0067% fail on Brake drums
-
3.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(99% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Brake performance
(62% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.081% fail on
Service brake performance
(80% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.067% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Service brake imbalance (83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0067% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0067% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0067% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0067% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.067% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.067% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.054% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.040% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.034% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0067% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.013% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.040% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.0067% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.0067% fail on
Rbt
- 0.0067% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.0067% fail on
Rbt
-
0.081% fail on
Service brake performance
(80% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.088% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.088% fail on Pedal (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Flexible brake hoses (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.034% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.027% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.0067% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.020% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.020% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.013% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.013% fail on Other components
-
0.0067% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.0067% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.0067% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0067% fail on Brake fluid
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(73% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Visibility
(45% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Wipers (48% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.027% fail on Windscreen
-
0.027% fail on
View to rear
- 0.020% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0067% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.013% fail on Driver's view
- 0.013% fail on Bonnet
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension
(46% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Springs
(23% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Coil springs
(23% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Coil spring (23% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Coil springs
(23% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Suspension arms
(67% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes (50% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint (90% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.013% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.047% fail on Shock absorbers (66% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.034% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joints (83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0067% fail on Linkage
- 0.0067% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0067% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.013% fail on Wheel bearings (84% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0067% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.0067% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.0067% fail on
Axles
- 0.0067% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.0067% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0067% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.88% fail on
Springs
(23% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(24% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(23% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (45% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.034% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.013% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.013% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.20% fail on
Spark ignition
(57% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.42% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.027% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.027% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.62% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(23% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Steering
-
0.24% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.23% fail on Track rod end
- 0.013% fail on Ball joint
-
0.027% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.027% fail on Steering rack
-
0.013% fail on
Power steering
- 0.013% fail on Operation
- 0.013% fail on Steering column
- 0.0067% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.0067% fail on
Steering play
- 0.0067% fail on Steering rack
-
0.24% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.22% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.15% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.15% fail on Condition
- 0.081% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.15% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.16% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.16% fail on Registration plates
-
0.15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Transmission
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Joints (76% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.034% fail on
Doors
-
0.020% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.020% fail on Door condition
-
0.0067% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.0067% fail on Door condition
-
0.0067% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.0067% fail on Door condition
-
0.020% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.027% fail on Exhaust system (83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.013% fail on Pipe
- 0.0067% fail on Tank
-
0.020% fail on
Seats
- 0.013% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.0067% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.013% fail on
Body
- 0.0067% fail on Panel
- 0.0067% fail on Other body component
- 0.0067% fail on Bumpers
-
0.047% fail on
Transmission
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Road Wheels
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Attachment (71% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0067% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0067% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volvo XC60 (2008 - 2017)
Comfortable and refined. Good long-distance car. Stylish cabin and R Design models look sporty.