Volvo XC60 MOT Results
Registered in 201582.7% pass rate
from 12,773 tests in 2021
(6.5% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo XC60 is unusually good or bad.
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.0078% fail on Size/type
-
4.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.016% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(25% better than other 2015 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (24% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.89% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.70% fail on
Headlamps
(33% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Headlamp (50% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.59% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.086% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.086% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.070% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(71% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(71% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(71% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.047% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.0078% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.0078% fail on Position lamp
-
0.0078% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.0078% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Brakes
-
3.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(33% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads (57% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Brake linings
-
0.34% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(44% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Brake discs (44% better than other 2015 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Brake performance
(80% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Service brake performance
(89% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Rbt
(88% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Service brake performance (92% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Service brake imbalance (72% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Rbt
(88% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.070% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(81% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Rbt (sp) (80% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(87% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(87% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.016% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(87% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Service brake performance
(89% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.15% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(65% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.0078% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.023% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.023% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.016% fail on
Parking brake control
(89% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
3.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(33% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Visibility
(33% better than other 2015 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Wipers (31% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
View to rear
- 0.055% fail on Mirrors
-
0.039% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.039% fail on Windscreen
- 0.031% fail on Driver's view (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Bonnet
-
2.2% fail on
Suspension
(33% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Springs
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.8% fail on Coil spring
- 0.0078% fail on Mounting
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.18% fail on
Suspension arms
(81% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.023% fail on Ball joint (95% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(55% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.031% fail on Ball joint
- 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.016% fail on Linkage
- 0.0078% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0078% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.023% fail on Shock absorbers (90% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.016% fail on Suspension rod (23 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.016% fail on Wheel bearings (88% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.0078% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.0078% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.0078% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0078% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.8% fail on
Springs
-
1.1% fail on
Steering
(180% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0078% fail on Locking devices
-
0.039% fail on
Power steering
(3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.0078% fail on Other components
-
0.031% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.031% fail on Steering rack
- 0.016% fail on Steering wheel (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.0078% fail on
Steering play
- 0.0078% fail on Steering rack
-
1.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.92% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.63% fail on
Compression ignition
(38% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (93% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Emissions not tested (190% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.016% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (88% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Spark ignition
(55% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.63% fail on
Compression ignition
(38% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.023% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.016% fail on Other leaks
-
0.92% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.32% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(66% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Transmission
(75% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Drive shafts
(74% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Joints (73% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Drive shafts
(74% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.063% fail on
Doors
-
0.039% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.039% fail on Door condition
-
0.016% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.0078% fail on Door condition
- 0.0078% fail on Catch
-
0.0078% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.0078% fail on Door condition
-
0.039% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.039% fail on
Body
- 0.031% fail on Other body component
- 0.0078% fail on Panel
-
0.031% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.023% fail on System (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0078% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.0078% fail on
Towbar
- 0.0078% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.0078% fail on
Load security
-
0.0078% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.0078% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.0078% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.0078% fail on
Seats
- 0.0078% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.0078% fail on Undertray
-
0.094% fail on
Transmission
(75% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.19% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.19% fail on Registration plates
-
0.055% fail on
Road Wheels
(75% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Attachment (68% better than other 2015 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volvo XC60 (2008 - 2017)
Comfortable and refined. Good long-distance car. Stylish cabin and R Design models look sporty.