Volvo XC60 MOT Results
Registered in 201272.1% pass rate
from 5,049 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo XC60 is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(14% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Springs
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Coil springs
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Coil springs
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(61% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.079% fail on Ball joint (95% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.44% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(72% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joints (67% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.079% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (81% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Ball joint
- 0.020% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings (60% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Shock absorbers (85% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint
-
0.040% fail on
Axles
- 0.040% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.020% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.020% fail on Sub-frame
-
9.1% fail on
Springs
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(22% better than other 2012 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(24% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.22% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.0% fail on Stop lamp (50% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (54% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Direction indicators
(68% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Flashing type
(68% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.099% fail on Individual direction indicators (90% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Flashing type
(68% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.38% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.38% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.24% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.14% fail on Horn
- 0.079% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.059% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.020% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.020% fail on Position lamp
-
0.020% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.020% fail on Reversing lamps
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(24% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Tyres
(23% better than other 2012 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Size/type
-
3.9% fail on
Steering
(150% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
(170% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Track rod end (180% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Drag link end
- 0.020% fail on Locking devices
-
0.22% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.22% fail on Steering rack
-
0.079% fail on
Power steering
- 0.059% fail on Operation
- 0.020% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.059% fail on
Steering play
- 0.059% fail on Steering rack
-
3.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
(170% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Visibility
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.3% fail on Washers (38% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
View to rear
- 0.079% fail on Mirrors
- 0.040% fail on Bonnet
-
0.040% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.040% fail on Windscreen
- 0.020% fail on Driver's view
-
3.7% fail on
Brakes
(37% better than other 2012 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.020% fail on Brake linings
-
0.55% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(43% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Brake discs (43% better than other 2012 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.51% fail on
Brake performance
(80% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(82% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake performance
(90% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
(91% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Service brake performance (92% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.020% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.020% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
(91% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(71% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(80% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Service brake imbalance (79% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.040% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.079% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(80% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.099% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.020% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.020% fail on
Rbt
- 0.020% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.020% fail on
Rbt
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(82% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.46% fail on Anti-lock braking system (97% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.14% fail on Pedal
- 0.020% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.020% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.020% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.020% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.020% fail on Other components
-
2.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(59% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Transmission
-
0.75% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.75% fail on Joints
-
0.75% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.079% fail on
Body
- 0.079% fail on Other body component
-
0.079% fail on
Doors
-
0.059% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.059% fail on Door condition
-
0.020% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.020% fail on Door condition
-
0.059% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.040% fail on Exhaust system (96% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.020% fail on Pipe
- 0.020% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.020% fail on Bumpers
-
0.020% fail on
Seats
- 0.020% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.020% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.020% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.75% fail on
Transmission
-
0.69% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(66% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(65% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.079% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.059% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.099% fail on
Spark ignition
(92% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (88% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.57% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.020% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.020% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.67% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(65% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.42% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.26% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.26% fail on Condition
-
0.44% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.44% fail on Registration plates
-
0.079% fail on
Road Wheels
(79% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Attachment (72% better than other 2012 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volvo XC60 (2008 - 2017)
Comfortable and refined. Good long-distance car. Stylish cabin and R Design models look sporty.