MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Volvo » XC60 » 2010

Volvo XC60 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
74.2% pass rate
from 4,101 tests in 2017
(11% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo XC60 is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (19% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (23% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.024% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.024% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.0% fail on Position lamps (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Front lamps (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.88% fail on Stop lamp (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Direction indicators (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Flashing type (57% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.024% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.024% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.32% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.24% fail on Horn
    • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.049% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.024% fail on Battery
  • 8.4% fail on Suspension
    • 6.2% fail on Coil springs (89% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Condition (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Location
    • 0.90% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.90% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.90% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.66% fail on Trailing arms (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment
    • 0.29% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bars (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.098% fail on Front
      • 0.024% fail on Rear
    • 0.073% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.073% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment
    • 0.049% fail on Front suspension joints (86% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.049% fail on Size/type
  • 4.1% fail on Brakes (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.32% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.024% fail on Brake linings
    • 0.71% fail on Brake performance (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Front wheels (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear wheels (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Brake operation (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.024% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.024% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
        • 0.20% fail on Anti-slip (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Components (59% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.098% fail on Hoses
        • 0.073% fail on Pipes (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.073% fail on ABS
    • 0.049% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.024% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.024% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.024% fail on Restricted movement
  • 3.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.59% fail on Washers (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.073% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.9% fail on Steering (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Steering system (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.073% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.024% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Drive system
    • 0.12% fail on Steering operation (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.73% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.56% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.17% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment
      • 0.024% fail on Installation check
        • 0.024% fail on Anchorage's
  • 0.24% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.24% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.20% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.098% fail on Body condition
    • 0.098% fail on Doors
      • 0.098% fail on Drivers
  • 0.17% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.098% fail on System
      • 0.024% fail on Tank
    • 0.049% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
  • 0.024% fail on Towbars
    • 0.024% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review

  • Volvo XC60 (2008 - 2017)
    Very comfortable and refined. Makes a good long distance car. Stylish cabin. R Design models look sporty. Low emissions DRIVe versions available.

    Search Good Garages