Volvo XC60 MOT Results
Registered in 200974.6% pass rate
from 3,142 tests in 2017
(22% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo XC60 is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(28% better than other 2009 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp
-
0.45% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.032% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.032% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.032% fail on Dipswitch
-
1.6% fail on
Position lamps
(57% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Front lamps (48% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.032% fail on All position lamps
- 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Direction indicators
(46% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Flashing type
(46% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.032% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.83% fail on
Flashing type
(46% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.35% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.19% fail on Horn
- 0.095% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.064% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.032% fail on Battery
- 0.032% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.032% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.032% fail on Switch
-
7.4% fail on
Suspension
(31% better than other 2009 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.6% fail on Condition
- 0.032% fail on Location
-
1.4% fail on
Trailing arms
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(75% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (75% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Attachment
-
0.48% fail on
Drive shafts
(56% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Front drive shafts
(59% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Constant velocity joints (58% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.032% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.45% fail on
Front drive shafts
(59% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Suspension arms
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Shock absorbers
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.13% fail on Rear
- 0.064% fail on Front
-
0.032% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.032% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
4.6% fail on
Coil springs
-
5.2% fail on
Tyres
(27% better than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition (42% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Valve stem
- 0.064% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
- 0.064% fail on Size/type
-
3.8% fail on
Brakes
(42% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Hub components
- 2.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.41% fail on Brake discs
- 0.032% fail on Brake linings
- 0.032% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.45% fail on
Brake performance
(84% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.064% fail on Front wheels (92% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.032% fail on Rear wheels
-
0.35% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(56% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Components
(56% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Hoses
- 0.064% fail on Pipes (87% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Leaks
-
0.29% fail on
Components
(56% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.13% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.13% fail on
Pedal
- 0.13% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.13% fail on
Pedal
- 0.095% fail on ABS
- 0.032% fail on Restricted movement
-
2.8% fail on
Hub components
-
3.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(31% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.89% fail on Washers (58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Windscreen
- 0.16% fail on Bonnet
- 0.064% fail on Mirrors
-
1.3% fail on
Steering
-
0.92% fail on
Steering system
- 0.73% fail on Track rod end
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
- 0.064% fail on Ball joint
-
0.29% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Operation (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Steering operation
-
0.92% fail on
Steering system
-
0.67% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.35% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.35% fail on Condition
-
0.32% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.32% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.35% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.41% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.41% fail on Registration plate
-
0.32% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.19% fail on Body condition
-
0.095% fail on
Doors
- 0.064% fail on Passengers other
- 0.032% fail on Drivers
- 0.032% fail on Body security
-
0.22% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(89% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.16% fail on System
- 0.032% fail on Pipe
- 0.032% fail on Cap
-
0.22% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.19% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volvo XC60 (2008 - 2017)
Very comfortable and refined. Makes a good long distance car. Stylish cabin. R Design models look sporty. Low emissions DRIVe versions available.