Volvo V70 MOT Results
Registered in 200966.6% pass rate
from 4,115 tests in 2021
(18% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo V70 is unusually good or bad.
-
9.9% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(21% better than other 2009 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(31% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(76% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
(75% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (91% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.024% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.024% fail on Arm
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
(75% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
(22% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.049% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.049% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.80% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (59% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.39% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.39% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.19% fail on Stop lamp (94% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.15% fail on Position lamp
- 0.024% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.024% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.024% fail on Horn
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(31% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Suspension
(41% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(25% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (44% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover (63% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.049% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.8% fail on
Springs
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Coil springs
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Coil spring (51% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Mounting
- 0.024% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
2.8% fail on
Coil springs
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(53% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Linkage ball joints (48% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (61% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.049% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.049% fail on Linkage (79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.29% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.097% fail on Ball joint
- 0.049% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.097% fail on
Axles
- 0.073% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.024% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
0.049% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.049% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.024% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.024% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.024% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(25% better than other 2009 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Tyres
- 4.4% fail on Condition (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth (25% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Size/type
-
6.4% fail on
Visibility
- 4.6% fail on Washers (53% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Wipers (40% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Bonnet
-
0.12% fail on
View to rear
- 0.12% fail on Mirrors
-
0.073% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.073% fail on Windscreen
- 0.024% fail on Driver's view
-
4.9% fail on
Brakes
(44% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(35% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Brake linings
-
0.51% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(56% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Brake discs (56% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(35% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Brake performance
(61% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(48% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
(47% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
(47% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(87% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp) (86% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.17% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(75% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.073% fail on Service brake imbalance (86% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.024% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(75% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Parking brake performance
(95% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Rbt
- 0.024% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.024% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.024% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.024% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(48% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.097% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Pedal
- 0.097% fail on Rigid brake pipes (90% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.097% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Anti-lock braking system (82% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.073% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.024% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.024% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.024% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.024% fail on Brake fluid
-
3.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(39% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(39% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(47% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (93% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.049% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.024% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.024% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.39% fail on
Spark ignition
(86% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (74% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Catalyst emissions (95% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(47% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.073% fail on Undertray
-
0.049% fail on
Fluid leaks
(82% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Engine oil leaks (79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(39% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(44% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (33% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Transmission
(71% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Drive shafts
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Joints (69% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Drive shafts
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Doors
-
0.19% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.19% fail on Door condition
-
0.049% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.049% fail on Door condition
-
0.024% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.024% fail on Door condition
-
0.19% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.19% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.097% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.073% fail on Pipe
- 0.024% fail on Tank
-
0.12% fail on
Body
- 0.097% fail on Other body component
- 0.024% fail on Body condition
- 0.049% fail on Bumpers
-
0.049% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.049% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.049% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.049% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.024% fail on
Towbar
- 0.024% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.024% fail on
Load security
-
0.024% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.024% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.024% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.024% fail on Undertray
-
2.0% fail on
Steering
-
1.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(38% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (37% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Ball joint
-
0.73% fail on
Steering gear
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Power steering
- 0.049% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.024% fail on Operation
- 0.024% fail on Steering shaft
-
0.024% fail on
Steering play
- 0.024% fail on Steering rack
-
1.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(38% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(39% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.34% fail on Condition
- 0.32% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.34% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.51% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.39% fail on Attachment
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
0.29% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.27% fail on Registration plates
- 0.024% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volvo V70 (2007 - 2016)
Big and practical estate. Perfect for families. Good cabin quality. Plenty of safety kit as standard.