Volvo V70 MOT Results
Registered in 199850.4% pass rate
from 2,228 tests in 2017
(5.8% worse than other 1998 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo V70 is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(18% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Headlamp aim (62% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (63% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(130% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Flashing type
(130% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Individual lamps (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.90% fail on All direction indicators (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Flashing type
(130% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.5% fail on Front lamps
- 0.40% fail on Rear lamps (77% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.27% fail on All position lamps (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Switch
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp
-
0.13% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Switch
- 2.3% fail on Battery (88% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(73% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Fog lamp (74% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Tell tale
- 0.22% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.18% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.13% fail on Switch
- 0.045% fail on Lamp
- 0.045% fail on Horn
-
22% fail on
Brakes
(34% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(26% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Parking brake performance (89% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Rear wheels (41% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Front wheels (39% better than other 1998 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.36% fail on Service brake performance (77% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Gradient hand brake (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 7.9% fail on ABS (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(30% better than other 1998 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Components
(30% better than other 1998 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Hoses (92% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Pipes (92% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.27% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.090% fail on Leaks (80% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Operation
-
4.1% fail on
Components
(30% better than other 1998 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Hub components
(46% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Brake pads (81% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Brake discs
- 0.045% fail on Brake linings
- 0.045% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.045% fail on Brake calipers
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Electronic stability system (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.22% fail on
Pedal
- 0.13% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.090% fail on Condition
-
0.22% fail on
Pedal
- 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.045% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.045% fail on Cable
- 0.045% fail on Locking devices
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(26% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
8.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(110% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.045% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.045% fail on Drive shafts
-
8.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(110% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(55% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (78% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.22% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.045% fail on Attachment
-
4.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(35% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (40% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Condition
- 0.090% fail on Attachment
- 2.3% fail on Front suspension joints (72% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.7% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.3% fail on Front (78% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Rear (91% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Sub-frames
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.045% fail on Condition
-
0.72% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.72% fail on Condition
-
0.54% fail on
Coil springs
(74% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Condition (80% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Location
-
0.40% fail on
Prescribed areas
(94% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Component mounting (96% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.090% fail on Subframe mounting (93% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.045% fail on Attachment
-
0.31% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.13% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.090% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.090% fail on Condition
-
0.045% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.045% fail on Attachment
-
0.045% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.045% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.045% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.045% fail on Condition
-
0.045% fail on
Axles
- 0.045% fail on Swivel joints/housing
- 0.045% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
8.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(19% better than other 1998 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.5% fail on Emissions (47% better than other 1998 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.67% fail on System (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Cap
- 0.090% fail on Tank
- 0.045% fail on Hose
- 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.5% fail on
Tyres
- 4.7% fail on Condition (47% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.49% fail on Size/type
- 0.18% fail on Valve stem
-
8.0% fail on
Steering
(81% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Steering system
(68% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Track rod end (80% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Steering rack (64% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
- 0.31% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Free play
- 0.18% fail on Steering rack
- 0.090% fail on Drag link end
- 0.090% fail on Lock stop (14 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Power steering
(190% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.18% fail on Rams (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Steering operation (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Steering control
- 0.090% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.045% fail on Steering lock
-
0.045% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.045% fail on Universal joint
- 0.090% fail on Locking devices
-
6.2% fail on
Steering system
(68% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(21% better than other 1998 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 0.94% fail on Washers (72% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Bonnet
- 0.36% fail on Windscreen
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors
-
2.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(57% better than other 1998 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
(60% better than other 1998 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas (93% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Attachment
-
0.045% fail on
Installation check
- 0.045% fail on Anchorage's
-
0.81% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(45% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.81% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
(60% better than other 1998 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(64% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Doors
- 0.18% fail on Drivers
- 0.18% fail on Passengers front
- 0.18% fail on Passengers other
-
0.40% fail on
Seats
- 0.22% fail on Drivers
- 0.18% fail on Passengers
- 0.31% fail on Engine mountings (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Body condition (91% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Body security
-
0.045% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.045% fail on Chassis
-
0.045% fail on
Load security
- 0.045% fail on Tailgate
-
0.54% fail on
Doors
-
1.3% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate
-
0.72% fail on
Road Wheels
(110% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Attachment
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
0.090% fail on
Towbars
- 0.090% fail on Vehicle structure