Volvo V40 MOT Results
Registered in 201573.4% pass rate
from 15,944 tests in 2021
(40% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo V40 is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
11% fail on
Springs
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 11% fail on Coil spring (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Suspension arms
(65% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes (63% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint (78% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0063% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.27% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.094% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.069% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.038% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0063% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers (53% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.031% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.019% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.013% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.013% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.0063% fail on
Axles
- 0.0063% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.0063% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0063% fail on Pins and bushes
-
11% fail on
Springs
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Tyres
(32% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Condition (45% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth (24% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Size/type (90% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(24% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
(17% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (19% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.78% fail on
Headlamps
(25% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Headlamp (30% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.025% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.0063% fail on Dipswitch
-
0.55% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.55% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.55% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.19% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.13% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.063% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.063% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.038% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (93% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.019% fail on Position lamp
- 0.019% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.013% fail on
Electrical equipment
(88% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0063% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.0063% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.0063% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.0063% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.0063% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
(17% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Brakes
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads
- 0.025% fail on Brake linings
-
0.38% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(38% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Brake discs (38% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.0063% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0063% fail on Linkage
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.83% fail on
Brake performance
(24% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.53% fail on
Rbt
- 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.063% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.013% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0063% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0063% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.53% fail on
Rbt
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(56% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp) (55% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Parking brake performance
(49% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Rbt
- 0.069% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.0063% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.0063% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.082% fail on
Rbt
- 0.075% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.069% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.069% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.044% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.038% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.069% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.55% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.18% fail on Lever
-
0.16% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.15% fail on Hand lever (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0063% fail on Pedal
-
0.088% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.075% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.044% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.063% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.056% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0063% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.044% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.044% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.019% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.0063% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.0063% fail on Leaks
- 0.0063% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.0063% fail on Load sensing valves
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(150% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(150% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.9% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (13 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (78% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.069% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.25% fail on
Spark ignition
(61% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (45% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Catalyst emissions (89% better than other 2015 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.025% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.0063% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.0063% fail on Other leaks
-
0.019% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.019% fail on Undertray
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(150% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Visibility
(45% better than other 2015 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Wipers (45% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Washers (57% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.088% fail on
View to rear
- 0.088% fail on Mirrors
-
0.069% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.069% fail on Windscreen
- 0.013% fail on Driver's view
- 0.0063% fail on Bonnet
-
1.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(35% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Transmission
(100% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.031% fail on Joints
-
0.74% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Doors
(5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Other passenger's door
(11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Door condition (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.0063% fail on Door condition
- 0.0063% fail on Catch
-
0.0063% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.0063% fail on Door condition
-
0.33% fail on
Other passenger's door
(11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Exhaust system (76% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.013% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.013% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Body
- 0.019% fail on Other body component
- 0.013% fail on Bumpers
- 0.013% fail on Undertray
-
0.0063% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.0063% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.77% fail on
Transmission
(100% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.18% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.11% fail on
Seat belts
(46% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.23% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
- 0.075% fail on Condition
-
0.23% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.22% fail on Registration plates
- 0.0063% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.088% fail on
Steering
(78% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.025% fail on Steering rack
- 0.013% fail on Operation (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Steering linkage components
(91% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Ball joint
- 0.013% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.0063% fail on Steering arm
- 0.0063% fail on Locking devices
-
0.013% fail on
Steering play
- 0.013% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0063% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.038% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.013% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
(32 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Doors
(36 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.013% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (36 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.013% fail on
Doors
(36 times worse than other 2015 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volvo V40 (2012 - 2019)
Comfortable and enjoyable to drive, a good (if rather confusing) range of engines, fabulous record on safety.