Volvo V40 MOT Results
Registered in 200248.3% pass rate
from 1,378 tests in 2021
(13% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo V40 is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Suspension
(43% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.36% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.22% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Springs
(120% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Coil springs
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Coil spring (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Mounting
-
8.1% fail on
Coil springs
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint
- 0.073% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (51% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Macpherson strut
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.73% fail on
Suspension rods
(7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.073% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.073% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.51% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings (68% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.073% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.073% fail on
Axles
- 0.073% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.073% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.073% fail on Sub-frame
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(38% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.73% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
5.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Flashing type
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.073% fail on Switch
-
5.4% fail on
Flashing type
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.073% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.87% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.51% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.22% fail on Horn
- 0.073% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.073% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.65% fail on
Position lamps
(190% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Position lamp (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Switch
-
0.65% fail on
Hazard warning
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Outline marker lamps
- 0.073% fail on Outline marker lamp
-
5.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(38% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(21% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(39% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (48% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
-
2.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
(74% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
(77% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (82% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.073% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.073% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
(77% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(49% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(48% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.65% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(48% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(39% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(42% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(66% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Brake pads (67% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.6% fail on Brake discs
- 0.073% fail on Brake drums
-
0.29% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.22% fail on Cable
- 0.073% fail on Relay lever
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(66% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.51% fail on Pedal
- 0.22% fail on Hand lever
-
0.51% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.51% fail on Lever
-
0.29% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.073% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.073% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.22% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.073% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.22% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system (89% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.073% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.073% fail on Other components
-
9.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.2% fail on
Transmission
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.0% fail on Joints
-
0.22% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.22% fail on Joints
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Front passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Catch
-
0.51% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.51% fail on Door condition
-
0.29% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.29% fail on Door condition
-
0.87% fail on
Front passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Hose
- 0.15% fail on Pipe
- 0.073% fail on Tank
-
0.87% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.87% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.51% fail on
Body
- 0.36% fail on Other body component
- 0.15% fail on Panel
- 0.15% fail on Bumpers
-
0.073% fail on
Towbar
- 0.073% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.073% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.073% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.073% fail on
Seats
- 0.073% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.073% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.073% fail on Other boot lid component
-
4.2% fail on
Transmission
-
8.4% fail on
Steering
(99% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.8% fail on Track rod end (46% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
-
0.073% fail on
Power steering
- 0.073% fail on Other components
-
4.9% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Visibility
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers (49% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
View to rear
- 0.29% fail on Mirrors
-
0.22% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.22% fail on Windscreen
- 0.073% fail on Driver's view
-
7.1% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 0.36% fail on Size/type
-
5.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(26% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(26% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.15% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.44% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.29% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.073% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.073% fail on Sound deadening material
-
4.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(26% better than other 2002 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas (85% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.87% fail on Registration plates
-
0.36% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
- 0.073% fail on Condition