Volvo V40 MOT Results
Registered in 200049.9% pass rate
from 581 tests in 2021
(15% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo V40 is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
(28% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.69% fail on Ball joint
- 0.52% fail on Linkage
- 0.34% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
6.5% fail on
Springs
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Coil springs
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Coil spring (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Coil springs
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint
- 0.69% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.34% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.69% fail on
Suspension rods
(5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.52% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
-
0.34% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers
-
8.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(32% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Headlamps
(76% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Headlamp (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
6.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(67% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim (61% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Stop lamp (56% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.17% fail on Switch
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.52% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.52% fail on Position lamp
-
0.34% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.34% fail on Switch
-
0.17% fail on
Outline marker lamps
- 0.17% fail on Outline marker lamp
-
7.1% fail on
Headlamps
(76% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
7.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.17% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
-
1.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.69% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
-
0.69% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.69% fail on Brake discs
-
0.34% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.17% fail on Relay lever
- 0.17% fail on Pivot
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Hand lever
- 1.0% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.52% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.52% fail on Lever
-
0.52% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.52% fail on Other components (30 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.17% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.17% fail on Electronic braking system
-
7.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.8% fail on
Steering
(160% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Track rod end (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
-
0.17% fail on
Other components
- 0.17% fail on Steering linkage
-
5.2% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Operation
-
0.34% fail on
Power steering
- 0.34% fail on Operation
-
5.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Visibility
- 6.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 0.69% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Driver's view
-
0.17% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.17% fail on Windscreen
-
8.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.4% fail on
Transmission
-
3.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.4% fail on Joints
-
0.17% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.17% fail on Joints
-
3.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Hose (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Doors
-
0.52% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.52% fail on Door condition
-
0.17% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.17% fail on Door condition
-
0.17% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.17% fail on Door condition
-
0.52% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.52% fail on
Body
- 0.17% fail on Body condition
- 0.17% fail on Panel
- 0.17% fail on Other body component
-
0.34% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.34% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.17% fail on
Chassis
- 0.17% fail on Chassis condition
-
3.4% fail on
Transmission
-
7.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 3.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.17% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.17% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
7.4% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.34% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.17% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.17% fail on Sound deadening material
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
- 4.1% fail on Condition (88% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth
- 0.17% fail on Size/type
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.86% fail on Condition
- 0.69% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.0% fail on Registration plates
-
0.34% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Attachment