Volvo V40 MOT Results
Registered in 199746.8% pass rate
from 173 tests in 2021
(33% worse than other 1997 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo V40 is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(64% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(170% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Suspension arm (13 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Ball joint
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
-
6.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(180% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.58% fail on Linkage
- 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.58% fail on
Springs
-
0.58% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.58% fail on Coil spring
-
0.58% fail on
Coil springs
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
9.2% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.58% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.58% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.58% fail on Arm
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
- 1.2% fail on Horn
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.58% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.58% fail on Position lamp
- 0.58% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.58% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.58% fail on Switch
- 0.58% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.58% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
9.2% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
5.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
- 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
-
2.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
-
5.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
0.58% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.58% fail on Brake pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.2% fail on Pedal
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(70% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(72% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
13% fail on
Spark ignition
(84% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 10% fail on Catalyst emissions (90% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
13% fail on
Spark ignition
(84% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.58% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(72% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
13% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.0% fail on
Transmission
-
2.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.3% fail on Joints
-
1.7% fail on
Prop shafts
(4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.7% fail on
Chassis
- 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.2% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
-
1.2% fail on
Other passenger's door
(5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Other passenger's door
(5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Visibility
- 6.9% fail on Wipers
- 1.7% fail on Washers
- 0.58% fail on Bonnet
-
8.7% fail on
Tyres
(150% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.58% fail on Size/type
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.58% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.58% fail on Registration plates
-
0.58% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.58% fail on Speedometer