Volvo S80 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
76.5% pass rate
from 663 tests in 2017
(19% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo S80 is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.5% fail on Direction indicators (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Flashing type (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on All direction indicators (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Front lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.90% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Horn
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.7% fail on Brakes
    • 3.9% fail on Hub components
      • 3.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.45% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.60% fail on Brake performance (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
        • 0.15% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.15% fail on Restricted movement
  • 3.9% fail on Suspension (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.60% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.60% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.30% fail on Front
      • 0.15% fail on Rear
    • 0.45% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.45% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.45% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.30% fail on Tie bars/rods (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 3.8% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.30% fail on Steering operation (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
  • 3.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
  • 0.45% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.30% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.30% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 0.15% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.15% fail on Body condition
  • 0.15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
  • 0.15% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages