Volvo S80 MOT Results
Registered in 200460.4% pass rate
from 1,112 tests in 2017
(16% better than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo S80 is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(15% better than other 2004 cars)
-
10% fail on
Position lamps
(50% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Front lamps (61% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.090% fail on All position lamps
- 7.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
(34% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp (39% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.090% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.090% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.72% fail on
Direction indicators
(77% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Flashing type
(77% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.18% fail on Individual lamps (90% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Flashing type
(77% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.54% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.45% fail on Stop lamp (91% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Horn
- 0.090% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.090% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
10% fail on
Position lamps
(50% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
(37% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Parking brake performance (86% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Rear wheels (49% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Front wheels
- 0.72% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.090% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.2% fail on
Hub components
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads
- 0.72% fail on Brake discs
- 0.090% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.090% fail on Brake calipers
-
2.2% fail on
Parking brake
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.8% fail on ABS (83% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(76% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Components
(76% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Hoses
- 0.18% fail on Pipes (95% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Operation
-
1.2% fail on
Components
(76% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.090% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.090% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.090% fail on
Pedal
- 0.090% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.090% fail on
Pedal
-
0.090% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.090% fail on
Components
- 0.090% fail on Servos
-
0.090% fail on
Components
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
(37% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
10% fail on
Suspension
(49% better than other 2004 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.090% fail on Condition
- 0.090% fail on Attachment
-
3.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.9% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.090% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.090% fail on Drive shafts
-
2.9% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(52% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (59% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
- 0.090% fail on Linkage condition
- 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.45% fail on
Coil springs
(91% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Condition (92% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Location
-
0.27% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
0.27% fail on
Shock absorbers
(81% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.090% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.090% fail on Front
-
3.8% fail on
Suspension arms
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
(30% better than other 2004 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth
- 2.7% fail on Condition
-
6.2% fail on
Steering
-
5.7% fail on
Steering system
- 5.0% fail on Track rod end (59% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Steering rack
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
-
0.090% fail on
Free play
- 0.090% fail on Steering rack
-
0.18% fail on
Steering control
- 0.18% fail on Steering wheel (12 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Power steering
- 0.090% fail on Operation
- 0.090% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.090% fail on Steering operation
- 0.090% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.7% fail on
Steering system
-
5.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(39% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Wipers (51% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Washers
- 0.45% fail on Windscreen
- 0.18% fail on Mirrors
- 0.090% fail on Bonnet
-
4.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(38% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (39% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
(150% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Cap (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.27% fail on System
- 0.45% fail on Emissions (83% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(61% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.90% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.27% fail on
Seat belts
(81% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Requirements
- 0.090% fail on Condition
-
0.90% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.54% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.54% fail on Attachment
-
0.36% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.36% fail on Registration plate
-
0.27% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(85% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Body condition
-
0.090% fail on
Doors
- 0.090% fail on Passengers other