Volvo S40 MOT Results
Registered in 200554.3% pass rate
from 2,671 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo S40 is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
(16% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Springs
(68% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Coil springs
(69% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Coil spring (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Mounting
- 0.037% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
7.8% fail on
Coil springs
(69% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.0% fail on Linkage (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.64% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.075% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.075% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
- 0.41% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover (76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings (77% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.037% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.037% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.037% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.037% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.11% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.075% fail on
Sub-frames
(84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.037% fail on Ball joint
-
7.9% fail on
Springs
(68% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.037% fail on Dipswitch
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(29% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.075% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (48% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Stop lamp (77% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(53% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(53% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp (53% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(53% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.19% fail on Horn
- 0.075% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.15% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.15% fail on Position lamp
-
0.037% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.037% fail on Switch
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
8.7% fail on
Brake performance
(18% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(56% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
(73% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
(69% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Plate brake tester
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.075% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.6% fail on
Rbt
(69% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
(30% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (31% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.15% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.15% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.037% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
(30% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(61% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance (64% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.037% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(56% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
-
0.97% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.94% fail on Brake discs
- 0.037% fail on Brake drums
-
0.15% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.15% fail on Cable
-
2.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.67% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.67% fail on Lever
-
0.56% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(61% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Anti-lock braking system (63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.037% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.52% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.30% fail on Pedal
- 0.22% fail on Hand lever
-
0.26% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.037% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.19% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.075% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.037% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.075% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.075% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.037% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.037% fail on Other braking system component
- 0.037% fail on Additional braking device
-
0.037% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
8.7% fail on
Brake performance
(18% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Tyres
(26% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Condition (74% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.22% fail on Size/type
-
7.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.9% fail on
Transmission
(38% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(44% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Joints (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.037% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.037% fail on Joints
-
4.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(44% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system (30% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.037% fail on Tank
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
-
0.037% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.037% fail on Door condition
-
0.11% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.15% fail on Undertray
-
0.075% fail on
Body
- 0.075% fail on Panel
-
0.075% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.075% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.037% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.037% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.037% fail on
Chassis
- 0.037% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.037% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.037% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
4.9% fail on
Transmission
(38% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Visibility
(25% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Washers
- 2.8% fail on Wipers (27% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.11% fail on Windscreen
-
0.075% fail on
View to rear
- 0.075% fail on Mirrors
-
5.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(22% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(20% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested (58% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.037% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.037% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.45% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.075% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.075% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.075% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.037% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
4.1% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.19% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(20% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Steering
-
2.7% fail on
Steering gear
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(40% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Track rod end (42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Locking devices
- 0.075% fail on Ball joint
-
0.037% fail on
Other components
- 0.037% fail on Steering component
-
0.49% fail on
Power steering
- 0.30% fail on Other components (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Operation
- 0.037% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.037% fail on Pump
- 0.037% fail on Rams
-
0.037% fail on
Steering play
- 0.037% fail on Steering rack
-
2.7% fail on
Steering gear
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Road Wheels
(97% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Attachment (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
0.79% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(73% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Seat belts
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Condition
- 0.037% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.037% fail on Requirements
- 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (85% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Seat belts
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.56% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volvo S40 (2004 - 2012)
Comfortable, safe and enjoyable. Good looks, backed up by a decent drive.