Volvo S40 MOT Results
Registered in 200350.8% pass rate
from 1,283 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo S40 is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.6% fail on Headlamp
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.078% fail on Dipswitch
- 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
(86% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.47% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
(86% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (39% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.70% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.70% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.078% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.078% fail on Front fog lamps
-
0.70% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.62% fail on
Position lamps
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Position lamp (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.47% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.23% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.23% fail on Switch
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamps
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
8.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(64% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (74% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Linkage (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint
- 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.078% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
7.2% fail on
Springs
(84% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Coil springs
(85% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Coil spring (86% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
7.2% fail on
Coil springs
(85% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(30% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint
- 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.078% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.2% fail on
Macpherson strut
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.62% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (76% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.078% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.078% fail on Ball joint
-
8.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(64% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(24% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
(31% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(67% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
3.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
(98% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.078% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.078% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.078% fail on Parking brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.62% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(67% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
4.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(73% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(71% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Brake pads (73% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.9% fail on Brake discs (72% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.23% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Cable
- 0.078% fail on Linkage
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(71% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Flexible brake hoses (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.31% fail on Pedal
- 0.16% fail on Hand lever
-
0.47% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.47% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.31% fail on Lever
-
0.23% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.078% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.23% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.23% fail on
Prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Other braking system component (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
0.23% fail on
Prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(89% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Anti-lock braking system (87% better than other 2003 cars)
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
(31% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.1% fail on
Transmission
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.0% fail on Joints
-
0.16% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.16% fail on Joints
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.70% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.23% fail on Pipe
- 0.078% fail on Tank
- 0.078% fail on Hose
-
0.39% fail on
Doors
-
0.16% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.16% fail on Door condition
-
0.16% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.16% fail on Door condition
-
0.078% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.078% fail on Door condition
-
0.16% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.23% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(74% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (73% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Chassis
- 0.23% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.23% fail on
Seats
- 0.23% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.16% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.16% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.16% fail on
Body
- 0.16% fail on Other body component
-
4.1% fail on
Transmission
-
7.7% fail on
Steering
(73% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 4.3% fail on Track rod end (45% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Operation
-
0.078% fail on
Power steering
- 0.078% fail on Operation
-
4.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
7.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.7% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.078% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.55% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
6.7% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.23% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.23% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.2% fail on
Visibility
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers (49% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Bonnet
-
0.23% fail on
View to rear
- 0.23% fail on Mirrors
-
0.16% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.16% fail on Windscreen
-
6.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 0.078% fail on Size/type
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(54% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas (86% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.62% fail on Registration plates
-
0.55% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.55% fail on Attachment