Volvo S40 MOT Results
Registered in 199850.2% pass rate
from 295 tests in 2021
(30% worse than other 1998 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo S40 is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(87% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Dipswitch
-
7.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(100% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
6.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(180% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Flashing type
(180% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
-
6.4% fail on
Flashing type
(180% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Hazard warning
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.68% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.34% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.34% fail on Position lamp
- 0.34% fail on Rear reflectors
-
9.5% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
18% fail on
Suspension
- 9.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (95% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.4% fail on Ball joint
- 0.68% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.34% fail on Suspension arm
-
3.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.34% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.34% fail on Linkage
- 0.34% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.34% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.68% fail on
Springs
-
0.68% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.68% fail on Coil spring
-
0.68% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.34% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.34% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.34% fail on Sub-frame
-
13% fail on
Brakes
- 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
-
0.68% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.68% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.68% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
-
1.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.68% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.68% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.68% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.68% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.34% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.34% fail on Pedal
-
0.34% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.34% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.34% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
9.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.7% fail on
Transmission
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.7% fail on Joints
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.7% fail on
Doors
-
1.4% fail on
Other passenger's door
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.34% fail on Door condition
-
1.4% fail on
Other passenger's door
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.34% fail on
Body
- 0.34% fail on Other body component
-
7.8% fail on
Visibility
- 5.8% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers
-
0.34% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.34% fail on Windscreen
-
7.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.1% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.34% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
7.1% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.34% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.34% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
7.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.4% fail on
Steering
-
3.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
-
2.7% fail on
Steering gear
- 2.7% fail on Steering rack (170% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth
- 1.0% fail on Size/type (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 2.0% fail on Registration plates
-
0.34% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.34% fail on Attachment