Volvo C70 MOT Results
Registered in 200855.9% pass rate
from 1,358 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo C70 is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(33% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Springs
(90% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(91% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 11% fail on Coil spring (92% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(91% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes (68% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Ball joint
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 4.1% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(34% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.29% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Linkage
- 0.074% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.074% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.88% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.37% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.074% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.074% fail on Ball joint
-
0.074% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.074% fail on Pins and bushes
-
11% fail on
Springs
(90% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
(38% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (83% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (47% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Stop lamp (77% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.52% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.52% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.074% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.074% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.074% fail on Horn
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
(38% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(63% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.22% fail on Joints
-
8.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Exhaust system (52% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Doors
-
0.37% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.37% fail on Door condition
-
0.29% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.29% fail on Door condition
-
0.37% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.15% fail on
Body
- 0.15% fail on Other body component
-
0.074% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.074% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.074% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.074% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.074% fail on Bumpers
- 0.074% fail on Undertray
-
8.2% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Brakes
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.074% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.074% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.074% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.074% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
-
0.96% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.88% fail on
Rbt
- 0.88% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.074% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.074% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.88% fail on
Rbt
-
0.59% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.59% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.59% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(49% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Brake pads (51% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.88% fail on Brake discs
-
0.074% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.074% fail on Cable
-
3.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(49% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.88% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Hand lever (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Pedal
-
0.88% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.88% fail on Lever (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.37% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.37% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.15% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.074% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.074% fail on Valves
- 0.15% fail on Rigid brake pipes (90% better than other 2008 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.6% fail on
Tyres
(47% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.29% fail on Size/type
-
4.4% fail on
Steering
(63% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end
- 0.15% fail on Locking devices
-
0.29% fail on
Power steering
- 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Rams
- 0.074% fail on Steering column
-
2.9% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Visibility
(34% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers (52% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.074% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.074% fail on Windscreen
-
0.074% fail on
View to rear
- 0.074% fail on Mirrors
-
2.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(57% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.37% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.37% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.074% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.074% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.074% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Spark ignition
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.29% fail on Catalyst emissions (83% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.22% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.074% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.074% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.074% fail on Other leaks
-
2.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(57% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.74% fail on Attachment
- 0.22% fail on Condition
-
0.66% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(57% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.37% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.29% fail on Condition
-
0.29% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.29% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volvo C70 (2006 - 2010)
Genuine four-seat coupe-convertible. Tidy handling and a comfortable long-distance cruiser. Stylish looks, especially roof down.