Volvo C30 MOT Results
Registered in 200856.8% pass rate
from 3,934 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo C30 is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Suspension
(20% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Springs
(49% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Coil springs
(49% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Coil spring (50% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Mounting
-
8.9% fail on
Coil springs
(49% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(48% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint
- 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.025% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(25% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.84% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (59% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover (60% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings (64% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.20% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.10% fail on Ball joint
- 0.051% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.051% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.10% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.051% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.025% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.025% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
8.9% fail on
Springs
(49% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Direction indicators
(88% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
(88% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters (57% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.025% fail on Switch
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
(88% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.23% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.48% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.43% fail on Horn
- 0.051% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.43% fail on Stop lamp (89% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(61% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(61% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp (61% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(61% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.23% fail on Position lamp
- 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.025% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.025% fail on Switch
-
8.8% fail on
Tyres
(36% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Condition (70% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.28% fail on Size/type
-
8.0% fail on
Brakes
(20% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Brake performance
(32% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.025% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.025% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.025% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.025% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(54% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.79% fail on
Rbt
- 0.79% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.051% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.025% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.025% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.79% fail on
Rbt
-
0.33% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(50% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.025% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.33% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads
-
0.99% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.99% fail on Brake discs
-
0.076% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.076% fail on Cable
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.74% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.51% fail on Electronic stability control (90% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.71% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.31% fail on Hand lever
- 0.15% fail on Pedal
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.18% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.10% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.051% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.025% fail on Valves
- 0.10% fail on Rigid brake pipes (93% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.025% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.025% fail on Other components
-
3.6% fail on
Brake performance
(32% better than other 2008 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.3% fail on
Transmission
-
3.2% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.1% fail on Joints
- 0.051% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.076% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.076% fail on Joints
-
3.2% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.31% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.13% fail on Pipe
- 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.025% fail on Tank
- 0.025% fail on Hose
-
0.20% fail on
Body
- 0.20% fail on Other body component
-
0.10% fail on
Seats
- 0.076% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.025% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.076% fail on
Doors
(80% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.025% fail on Door condition
-
0.025% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.025% fail on Catch
-
0.025% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.025% fail on Door condition
-
0.025% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.051% fail on Bumpers
-
0.025% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.025% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.025% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.025% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.025% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.025% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.025% fail on Passenger compartment
-
3.3% fail on
Transmission
-
5.0% fail on
Visibility
(20% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Washers
- 1.9% fail on Wipers (33% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
View to rear
(130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Mirrors (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Indirect vision devices (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
- 0.10% fail on Bonnet
-
3.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(31% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(33% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(43% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Catalyst emissions (47% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (56% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.051% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.66% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.28% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.076% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.051% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.025% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
2.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(43% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.051% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.025% fail on Other leaks
-
0.051% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.051% fail on Undertray
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(33% better than other 2008 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Steering
-
2.2% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Steering linkage components
(66% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Track rod end (71% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.076% fail on
Other components
(7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Steering component (16 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.051% fail on Ball joint
- 0.025% fail on Locking devices
-
0.46% fail on
Power steering
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Operation
-
2.2% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (89% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts
(70% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Condition
- 0.025% fail on Requirements
-
0.051% fail on
Airbags
- 0.051% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.64% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.61% fail on Attachment
- 0.025% fail on Condition
-
0.56% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.56% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volvo C30 (2006 - 2009)
Really good looking coupe, on theme of 1800ES and 480. Best with 2.5 turbo engine and 17-inch wheels. Outstanding handling. 2.0D Powershift auto works well.