Volvo 240 MOT Results
Registered in 199263.6% pass rate
from 225 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo 240 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
3.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.44% fail on Switch
-
3.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp
-
2.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.44% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.8% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.3% fail on Horn
- 0.44% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.89% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.89% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.44% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.44% fail on Switch
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
13% fail on
Suspension
- 7.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (88% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint
- 0.44% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.89% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.89% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.44% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.89% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.89% fail on Ball joint
-
0.44% fail on
Axles
- 0.44% fail on Axle
- 0.44% fail on Shock absorbers
-
9.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.44% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.44% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
1.8% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.3% fail on Pipe
- 0.44% fail on Hose
- 0.44% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
1.3% fail on
Body
- 0.89% fail on Other body component
- 0.44% fail on Body condition
- 0.44% fail on Panel
-
0.89% fail on
Doors
-
0.89% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.89% fail on Door condition
-
0.44% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.44% fail on Door condition
-
0.89% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.89% fail on
Seats
- 0.89% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.44% fail on
Chassis
- 0.44% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.44% fail on
Towbar
- 0.44% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.44% fail on
Load security
- 0.44% fail on Tailgate
- 0.44% fail on Floor
-
9.3% fail on
Visibility
- 5.8% fail on Washers
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
- 0.44% fail on Bonnet
-
8.0% fail on
Brakes
-
6.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
-
0.44% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.44% fail on Brake discs
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.89% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.89% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.44% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.44% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.89% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
0.44% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.44% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.44% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
6.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.89% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.44% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.44% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.44% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
0.44% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
5.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.44% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.44% fail on Other leaks
-
5.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.0% fail on
Steering
-
1.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.8% fail on Track rod end
-
1.3% fail on
Power steering
- 0.44% fail on Operation
- 0.44% fail on Rams
- 0.44% fail on Other components
-
0.89% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.89% fail on Steering rack
-
1.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Condition
- 0.44% fail on Size/type
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.89% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.89% fail on Registration plates
-
0.89% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.89% fail on Attachment