MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Volkswagen » Touran » 2010

Volkswagen Touran MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.5% pass rate
from 5,666 tests in 2021
(5.6% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Touran is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.053% fail on Linkage (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.018% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 6.7% fail on Springs (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Coil springs (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Coil spring (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.088% fail on Mounting
    • 5.4% fail on Suspension arms (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.72% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.49% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.32% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.018% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.071% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.053% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.053% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.018% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.035% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 10.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (16% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators (75% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Switch
        • 0.018% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (27% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (23% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.018% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.018% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (25% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.12% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.035% fail on Horn (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.14% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.018% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.071% fail on Reversing lamps (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Reversing lamps (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.035% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.018% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres (47% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Condition (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 7.3% fail on Brakes
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.018% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.72% fail on Brake discs and drums (36% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Brake discs (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.12% fail on Cable
        • 0.018% fail on Lever
        • 0.018% fail on Pivot
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance (32% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.018% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (36% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (39% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (40% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.088% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.053% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.035% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.81% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.78% fail on Rbt
          • 0.56% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.053% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.018% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.018% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.018% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.018% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.28% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (50% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp) (49% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance (51% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.053% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.49% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.071% fail on Parking brake control (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Lever (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.035% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.018% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.053% fail on Rigid brake pipes (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Hand lever (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.071% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.018% fail on Particulate filter
      • 0.58% fail on Spark ignition (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (47% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.088% fail on Catalyst emissions (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Emissions not tested (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.053% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.088% fail on Noise suppression (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Undertray
      • 0.035% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility (18% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Condition of glass (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Windscreen (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.088% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission (30% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (28% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Joints (32% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.071% fail on Drive shaft (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.018% fail on Joints
      • 0.018% fail on Belts
    • 0.39% fail on Exhaust system (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Body
      • 0.18% fail on Other body component (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.071% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.071% fail on Doors
      • 0.053% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.053% fail on Door condition
      • 0.018% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.018% fail on Door condition
    • 0.053% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.053% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.053% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.053% fail on Seats
      • 0.035% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.018% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.053% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.035% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.018% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.053% fail on Undertray
    • 0.035% fail on Towbar (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Other towbar components (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.018% fail on Load security
      • 0.018% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.018% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 0.85% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.56% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
      • 0.035% fail on Requirements
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.49% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.49% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.34% fail on Attachment
    • 0.088% fail on Condition
  • 0.41% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Steering linkage components (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.018% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.053% fail on Steering gear (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Steering rack (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.018% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.018% fail on Steering play
      • 0.018% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.11% fail on Seat belt installation check (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Belt(s)/padding (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.018% fail on Anchorages
  • 0.018% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.018% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages