MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Volkswagen » Touran » 2010

Volkswagen Touran MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.9% pass rate
from 6,043 tests in 2020
(10% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Touran is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.066% fail on Linkage
      • 0.017% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.017% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 5.1% fail on Springs (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Coil springs (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Coil spring (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Mounting
      • 0.017% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.017% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.51% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.18% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.099% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.099% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.083% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.066% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.033% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.017% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.017% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (13% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps (27% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp (25% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Individual direction indicators (71% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp (38% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.13% fail on Horn
      • 0.033% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.017% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.17% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Switch
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.033% fail on Reversing lamps (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Reversing lamps (86% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 9.6% fail on Tyres (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.099% fail on Size/type
  • 6.4% fail on Brakes
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.017% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.88% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.88% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.12% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.083% fail on Cable
        • 0.033% fail on Lever
    • 2.6% fail on Brake performance (19% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (38% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (37% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.99% fail on Service brake performance (28% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.71% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt
          • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.050% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.033% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.25% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.050% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.99% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Anti-lock braking system (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Parking brake control (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Lever (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.066% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.033% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.017% fail on Other components
      • 0.017% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.017% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.017% fail on Brake fluid
  • 5.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.033% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.017% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.017% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.017% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.017% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.51% fail on Spark ignition (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.066% fail on Catalyst emissions (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.017% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.22% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.050% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.15% fail on Noise suppression (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Undertray (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 5.0% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on View to rear
      • 0.26% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.099% fail on Driver's view
  • 1.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Transmission
      • 0.88% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.84% fail on Joints
        • 0.017% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.017% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.083% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.083% fail on Joints
    • 0.31% fail on Exhaust system (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Body
      • 0.13% fail on Other body component
      • 0.017% fail on Panel
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.083% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.017% fail on Pipe
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.099% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.099% fail on Door condition
      • 0.033% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.017% fail on Door condition
        • 0.017% fail on Hinge
    • 0.083% fail on Undertray
    • 0.033% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.033% fail on Seats
      • 0.033% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.033% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.017% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.017% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 0.96% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.71% fail on Seat belts (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.017% fail on Requirements
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.48% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.48% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 0.066% fail on Condition
  • 0.23% fail on Steering (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.033% fail on Steering gear (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Operation
      • 0.017% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.033% fail on Electronic power steering
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages