Volkswagen Touran MOT Results
Registered in 201069.0% pass rate
from 5,261 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Touran is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.0% fail on
Position lamps
(34% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rear lamps (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Front lamps (76% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Individual lamps (77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.057% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.019% fail on Tell tales
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.89% fail on
Headlamps
(61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Fog lamp (68% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Battery
- 0.057% fail on Horn
- 0.038% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.019% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(30% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
(95% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Condition (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Location
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(85% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.076% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.019% fail on Condition
-
0.97% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.97% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.65% fail on
Shock absorbers
(39% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Condition (39% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.25% fail on Front
- 0.095% fail on Rear
-
0.32% fail on
Drive shafts
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Front drive shafts
(59% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Constant velocity joints (59% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.019% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.30% fail on
Front drive shafts
(59% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.038% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.019% fail on Condition
- 0.019% fail on Attachment
-
0.019% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.019% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
(95% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Tyres
(31% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Condition (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.057% fail on Size/type
- 0.057% fail on Valve stem
- 0.019% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
4.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.1% fail on Wipers
- 0.86% fail on Washers (53% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Windscreen
- 0.23% fail on Mirrors
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet
-
4.1% fail on
Brakes
(27% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Hub components
(27% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads (30% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Brake discs
- 0.15% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake performance
- 0.78% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.25% fail on Front wheels (61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.038% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.019% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.51% fail on ABS (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.076% fail on
Parking brake
(78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.076% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.057% fail on
Components
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Pipes
- 0.019% fail on Hoses
- 0.019% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.019% fail on Leaks
-
0.057% fail on
Components
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.019% fail on Cable
-
2.0% fail on
Hub components
(27% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.30% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.25% fail on Condition
- 0.038% fail on Requirements
- 0.038% fail on Attachment
-
0.13% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.13% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.30% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.44% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(69% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.095% fail on System
- 0.038% fail on Tank
- 0.038% fail on Pipe
- 0.13% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Emissions (69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.17% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.42% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.42% fail on Registration plate
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
- 0.038% fail on Condition
-
0.29% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.13% fail on Body condition
-
0.076% fail on
Doors
- 0.057% fail on Passengers other
- 0.019% fail on Drivers
-
0.038% fail on
Load security
- 0.019% fail on Bootlid
- 0.019% fail on Tailgate
- 0.019% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.019% fail on
Seats
- 0.019% fail on Passengers
-
0.17% fail on
Steering
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Steering system
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Steering rack
- 0.038% fail on Steering arm
-
0.019% fail on
Steering control
- 0.019% fail on Steering column
- 0.019% fail on Steering operation
-
0.019% fail on
Power steering
- 0.019% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.13% fail on
Steering system
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review