Volkswagen Tiguan MOT Results
Registered in 201065.7% pass rate
from 7,239 tests in 2021
(4.4% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Tiguan is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(59% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Springs
(70% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Coil springs
(70% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Coil spring (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Mounting
- 0.014% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
9.2% fail on
Coil springs
(70% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Suspension arm (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
6.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(91% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Linkage ball joints (37% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint
- 0.097% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.069% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.041% fail on Linkage (83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.80% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.39% fail on
Other suspension component
(67% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.041% fail on Ball joint
- 0.028% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.014% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.19% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.014% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.17% fail on
Suspension rods
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings (80% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.041% fail on
Sub-frames
(81% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
-
9.2% fail on
Springs
(70% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(43% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(28% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (23% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (65% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators (76% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.014% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (27% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Headlamps
(70% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.29% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.18% fail on Horn
- 0.083% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.028% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.014% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.28% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(52% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(51% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp (51% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(51% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.22% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.17% fail on Stop lamp (94% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.069% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.055% fail on Position lamp
- 0.014% fail on All position lamps
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(28% better than other 2010 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 3.1% fail on Condition
- 0.055% fail on Size/type (70% better than other 2010 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Brakes
(49% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.014% fail on Brake linings
-
1.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake performance
(70% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Service brake performance
(63% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Rbt
(65% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Service brake performance (61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Service brake imbalance (82% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Decelerometer
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Rbt
(65% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(75% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.069% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Service brake imbalance (87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.055% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.014% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.069% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(87% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Rbt (sp) (94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.014% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
0.014% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.014% fail on
Rbt
- 0.014% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.014% fail on
Rbt
-
0.75% fail on
Service brake performance
(63% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.097% fail on Anti-lock braking system (79% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake control
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Electronic parking brake (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.097% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.097% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.055% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.041% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.041% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.014% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.014% fail on Pedal
-
0.014% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.014% fail on Other components
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.3% fail on
Visibility
(37% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.70% fail on Washers (74% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
View to rear
- 0.12% fail on Mirrors
- 0.097% fail on Bonnet
-
0.097% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.097% fail on Windscreen
- 0.014% fail on Driver's view
-
2.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(32% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(30% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.069% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (89% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.79% fail on
Spark ignition
(62% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.083% fail on Catalyst emissions (91% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.055% fail on
Fluid leaks
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.028% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.014% fail on Sound deadening material
- 0.014% fail on Undertray
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(30% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(46% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Transmission
-
0.95% fail on
Drive shafts
(37% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Joints (37% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.33% fail on
Prop shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Prop shaft (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.097% fail on Flexible couplings (30 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Joints
-
0.95% fail on
Drive shafts
(37% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Exhaust system (67% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.083% fail on
Body
- 0.041% fail on Panel
- 0.041% fail on Other body component
-
0.069% fail on
Doors
-
0.028% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.028% fail on Door condition
-
0.028% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.028% fail on Door condition
-
0.014% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.014% fail on Door condition
-
0.028% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.028% fail on Bumpers
-
0.028% fail on
Towbar
(6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Coupling
- 0.014% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.028% fail on
Seats
- 0.028% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.028% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.028% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.014% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.014% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.014% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.014% fail on Tank
-
1.3% fail on
Transmission
-
0.76% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.55% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts
(59% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (50% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Airbags
- 0.028% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.014% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.30% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.30% fail on Registration plates
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
-
0.19% fail on
Steering
(92% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.097% fail on
Steering linkage components
(95% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Track rod end (95% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint
-
0.055% fail on
Steering gear
(82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Steering rack (81% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Steering column
-
0.014% fail on
Steering play
- 0.014% fail on Steering rack
- 0.014% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.097% fail on
Steering linkage components
(95% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volkswagen Tiguan (2008 - 2016)
Decent SUV with diesel automatic option. Comfortable seats. Escape version capable off-road. Optional Park Assist works well. Much better from September 2011 facelift.