Volkswagen Sharan MOT Results
Registered in 201684.1% pass rate
from 3,432 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Sharan is unusually good or bad.
-
5.4% fail on
Tyres
(37% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Condition (57% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.12% fail on Size/type
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension
(43% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Ball joint
- 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.15% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.058% fail on Ball joint
- 0.029% fail on Linkage
- 0.029% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.087% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.087% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.058% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.029% fail on
Springs
-
0.029% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.029% fail on Coil spring
-
0.029% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.029% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.029% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.029% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
2.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(29% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.058% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.38% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.35% fail on Headlamp
- 0.029% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.23% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.15% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.087% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.17% fail on Stop lamp (72% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.087% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.087% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.087% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.087% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.087% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.087% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.087% fail on Horn
-
0.029% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.029% fail on Position lamp
-
0.029% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.029% fail on Reversing lamps
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.4% fail on
Brakes
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
-
0.41% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.41% fail on Brake discs
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.61% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.35% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.15% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt
- 0.087% fail on Service brake performance (74% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
- 0.087% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.029% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt
- 0.087% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.087% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.087% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.087% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.029% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.087% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.12% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.12% fail on Electronic parking brake (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.087% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.058% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.029% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.058% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.029% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.029% fail on Brake fluid
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.4% fail on
Visibility
(40% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Wipers (43% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Washers
-
0.029% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.029% fail on Windscreen
-
1.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(53% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(55% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Compression ignition
(180% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.029% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.029% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.32% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.32% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.96% fail on
Compression ignition
(180% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.029% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.029% fail on Undertray
-
1.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(55% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.32% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.058% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.058% fail on Condition
-
0.029% fail on
Airbags
- 0.029% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.29% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.12% fail on
Transmission
-
0.087% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.087% fail on Joints
-
0.029% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.029% fail on Joints
-
0.087% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.058% fail on
Seats
- 0.029% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.029% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.029% fail on
Chassis
- 0.029% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.029% fail on
Towbar
- 0.029% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.029% fail on
Body
- 0.029% fail on Panel
-
0.029% fail on
Doors
-
0.029% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.029% fail on Door condition
-
0.029% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.12% fail on
Transmission
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
-
0.087% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.087% fail on Registration plates
-
0.029% fail on
Steering
-
0.029% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.029% fail on Track rod end
-
0.029% fail on
Steering linkage components
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volkswagen Sharan (2010 - 2021)
Strong yet frugal diesel engines. Clever use of space inside with integrated child seats. Standard DAB. Practical sliding rear side door.