MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Volkswagen » Scirocco » 2010

Volkswagen Scirocco MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.6% pass rate
from 6,936 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Scirocco is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Springs (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Coil springs (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 9.9% fail on Coil spring (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.014% fail on Leaf spring
    • 7.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Linkage ball joints (31% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.058% fail on Linkage (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms (18% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes (38% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.69% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.63% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.22% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.043% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.029% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.087% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.058% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.072% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Levelling valve (83 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Operation
    • 0.072% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.043% fail on Axles
      • 0.043% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.043% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.014% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (28% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp levelling device (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Individual direction indicators (56% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.63% fail on Stop lamp (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Electrical equipment (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Horn
      • 0.27% fail on Battery(ies) (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.16% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Switch
    • 0.087% fail on Reversing lamps (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Reversing lamps (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.014% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.014% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 7.5% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (34% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (33% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (27% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.89% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt
          • 0.81% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.043% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.014% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.014% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.014% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.25% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (56% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp) (55% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance (47% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake performance (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.029% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.043% fail on Cable
        • 0.043% fail on Lever
        • 0.014% fail on Linkage
    • 0.99% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Anti-lock braking system (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Electronic stability control (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.10% fail on Rigid brake pipes (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.058% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Hand lever (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Pedal
    • 0.058% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.043% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.014% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.043% fail on Parking brake control (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Lever (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.043% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.014% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
  • 4.0% fail on Visibility (25% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (20% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.029% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Catalyst emissions (35% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Catalytic converter (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.058% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.029% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.014% fail on NOx sensor
          • 0.014% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
          • 0.014% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.058% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
    • 0.16% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.014% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.058% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.043% fail on Undertray
      • 0.014% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 1.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Transmission (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Drive shafts (56% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Joints (58% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.014% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.058% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.058% fail on Joints
    • 0.29% fail on Exhaust system (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.014% fail on Pipe
      • 0.014% fail on System
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.058% fail on Doors (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.043% fail on Door condition
      • 0.014% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.014% fail on Door condition
    • 0.058% fail on Undertray
    • 0.043% fail on Body
      • 0.029% fail on Other body component
      • 0.014% fail on Panel
    • 0.029% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.014% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.014% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.014% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.014% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.014% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.87% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Seat belts (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.014% fail on Airbags
      • 0.014% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.81% fail on Road Wheels (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 0.55% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.55% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.35% fail on Steering (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Steering linkage components (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.014% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.014% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.087% fail on Steering gear (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Steering rack (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.014% fail on Steering play
      • 0.014% fail on Steering rack
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages