Volkswagen Polo MOT Results
Registered in 200246.8% pass rate
from 11,541 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Polo is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
(36% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (95% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Ball joint (91% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Anti-roll bar (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (61% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Linkage (45% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0087% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
8.6% fail on
Springs
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Coil springs
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Coil spring (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Mounting (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.0087% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.0087% fail on Spring saddle
-
8.6% fail on
Coil springs
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(29% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Pins and bushes (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Ball joint (62% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Suspension arm (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover (51% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.86% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.85% fail on Wheel bearings (39% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (87% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Other suspension component
(42% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.061% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.035% fail on Ball joint (85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.026% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.11% fail on
Axles
- 0.078% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.035% fail on Axle
- 0.0087% fail on Stub axle
-
0.095% fail on
Sub-frames
(83% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Sub-frame (85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.026% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (90% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.0087% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.061% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.035% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0087% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.0087% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.0087% fail on Suspension unit
-
9.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(13% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Headlamps
(24% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Headlamp (23% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Headlamp levelling device (43% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Stop lamp (12% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(18% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim (19% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.9% fail on
Direction indicators
(71% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
(71% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Side repeaters (33% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.23% fail on All direction indicators (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.0087% fail on Switch
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
(71% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (33% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(32% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(32% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Rear fog lamp (32% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.0087% fail on Switch
-
0.89% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(32% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Electrical equipment
(56% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Horn (63% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Battery(ies) (73% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.28% fail on Position lamp
- 0.017% fail on Switch
-
0.052% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.026% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.026% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.017% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.0087% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.0087% fail on Switch
-
6.2% fail on
Headlamps
(24% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
14% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(99% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
14% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
13% fail on
Spark ignition
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (48% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.052% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.017% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.017% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.0087% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.0087% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
-
0.60% fail on
Compression ignition
(31% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (62% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.078% fail on Emissions not tested (57% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.043% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.035% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.017% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.0087% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.0087% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.026% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
13% fail on
Spark ignition
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.35% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.035% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.026% fail on Other leaks
- 0.017% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.061% fail on
Noise suppression
(190% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Undertray (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.0087% fail on Sound deadening material
-
14% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(26% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Transmission
(81% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(85% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Joints (84% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Drive shaft (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.18% fail on Joints
- 0.017% fail on Belts
-
6.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(85% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.4% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Catch
-
0.47% fail on
Front passenger's door
(150% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.087% fail on Door condition
- 0.017% fail on Hinge
-
1.8% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.35% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.043% fail on Pipe
- 0.017% fail on Hose
- 0.017% fail on System
-
0.29% fail on
Body
- 0.17% fail on Other body component
- 0.095% fail on Panel
- 0.017% fail on Mounting fixings
- 0.0087% fail on Body condition
-
0.24% fail on
Seats
- 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.10% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.19% fail on Undertray (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(86% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Bumpers (57% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.052% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.026% fail on Bracket
-
0.052% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.043% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.0087% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.043% fail on
Chassis
(93% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.043% fail on Chassis condition (93% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.0087% fail on
Cabs
- 0.0087% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.0087% fail on Passenger compartment
-
6.5% fail on
Transmission
(81% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brakes
(12% better than other 2002 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
(10% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(28% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
(28% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance (29% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.0087% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.087% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.078% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.0087% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.026% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.026% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
(28% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(24% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (21% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (91% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.0087% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (30% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Service brake performance (47% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
(19% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.10% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.043% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.017% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0087% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.0087% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.017% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0087% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.0087% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(28% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.017% fail on Brake linings
-
0.88% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.86% fail on Brake discs
- 0.017% fail on Brake drums
-
0.21% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.11% fail on Lever (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Cable (59% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.0087% fail on Linkage
- 0.0087% fail on Pivot
- 0.0087% fail on Brake slack adjuster
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(50% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (63% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Electronic braking system (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Electronic stability control (80% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake control
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Lever (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Flexible brake hoses (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.62% fail on Hand lever (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Pedal (75% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(77% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.29% fail on Rigid brake pipes (92% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.026% fail on Valves
- 0.0087% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.16% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Servos
- 0.0087% fail on Operation
- 0.0087% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
0.035% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.026% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.026% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.0087% fail on Other components
-
0.026% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
0.017% fail on
Low pressure warning
(16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Air and vacuum systems (16 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.0087% fail on Load sensing valves
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
(10% better than other 2002 cars)
-
11% fail on
Visibility
(31% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Wipers (34% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
View to rear
(69% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Mirrors (73% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
- 0.095% fail on Bonnet
- 0.0087% fail on Driver's view
-
8.6% fail on
Tyres
(51% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Tread depth (55% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Condition (46% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Size/type (79% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Steering
-
3.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.035% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Drag link end (76% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Steering arm
-
0.017% fail on
Other components
- 0.017% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.017% fail on Locking devices
-
0.55% fail on
Steering gear
(40% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Steering rack (39% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Operation
-
0.47% fail on
Power steering
- 0.23% fail on Other components
- 0.16% fail on Operation
- 0.10% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.026% fail on Rams
- 0.16% fail on Electronic power steering (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.078% fail on
Steering play
- 0.078% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0087% fail on Steering column
-
3.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(23% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (28% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Seat belts
(67% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas (84% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Requirements
- 0.0087% fail on Attachment
-
0.10% fail on
Airbags
- 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.0% fail on Registration plates
-
0.24% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
- 0.078% fail on Condition
-
0.035% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.035% fail on Belt(s)/padding (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.026% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.017% fail on Speedometer
-
0.0087% fail on
Speed limiter
- 0.0087% fail on Speed limiter plate
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volkswagen Polo (2000 - 2002)
Facelifted Polo III, still with an upmarket image. Better than pre-facelift and all now have power steering.