Volkswagen Polo MOT Results
Registered in 199858.6% pass rate
from 1,062 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Polo is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Suspension
- 7.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (48% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes (99% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.094% fail on Suspension arm
-
1.3% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.85% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.66% fail on
Springs
(67% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Coil springs
(74% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Coil spring (74% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.47% fail on
Coil springs
(74% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.38% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.28% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(89% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.094% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.0% fail on Stop lamp (43% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.094% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
(59% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.0% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.66% fail on Horn
- 0.28% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.094% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.56% fail on
Direction indicators
(76% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Flashing type
(76% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Individual direction indicators (63% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Flashing type
(76% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(76% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(76% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(76% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.094% fail on Position lamp
-
0.094% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.094% fail on Switch
- 0.094% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.094% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.094% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
9.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.1% fail on
Chassis
- 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.75% fail on
Doors
-
0.66% fail on
Front passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Catch
-
0.094% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.094% fail on Door condition
-
0.66% fail on
Front passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.56% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.094% fail on Hose
-
0.66% fail on
Transmission
(77% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Joints (76% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Body
- 0.38% fail on Other body component
- 0.19% fail on Panel
-
0.47% fail on
Seats
- 0.28% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.19% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.28% fail on Floor
-
0.094% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.094% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.094% fail on
Cabs
- 0.094% fail on Prescribed areas
-
9.1% fail on
Brakes
(23% better than other 1998 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.094% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(57% better than other 1998 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (55% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.47% fail on
Rbt
- 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.094% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.47% fail on
Rbt
- 0.094% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
0.66% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.66% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.75% fail on Rigid brake pipes (71% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Load sensing valves (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.66% fail on Lever
-
0.47% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.28% fail on Hand lever
- 0.19% fail on Pedal
-
0.47% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.47% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.28% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.094% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.19% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
5.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.4% fail on
Spark ignition
- 6.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested (80% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.28% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.094% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.19% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.094% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.094% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
8.4% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.38% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.28% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.094% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
8.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(70% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Condition
- 0.094% fail on Requirements
- 0.66% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Visibility
- 4.5% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers
-
0.19% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.19% fail on Windscreen
-
0.19% fail on
View to rear
- 0.19% fail on Mirrors
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
(59% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Condition (97% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.094% fail on Size/type
-
1.8% fail on
Steering
(50% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Power steering
- 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.19% fail on Operation
- 0.094% fail on Other components
-
0.47% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.47% fail on Steering rack
-
0.38% fail on
Steering linkage components
(81% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Steering column (10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Steering play
- 0.094% fail on Steering rack
-
0.56% fail on
Power steering
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volkswagen Polo (1994 - 1999)
Competent hatchback with a comfortable ride and a classier image than it deserves.