Volkswagen Polo MOT Results
Registered in 199261.0% pass rate
from 272 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Polo is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
- 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
(180% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
(190% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.74% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
(190% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(110% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
-
0.74% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.74% fail on Cable
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.1% fail on Lever
- 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.74% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.37% fail on Pedal
- 0.37% fail on Hand lever
-
0.74% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.37% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.37% fail on Brake fluid
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Suspension
- 5.9% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
1.8% fail on
Springs
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.5% fail on Coil spring
- 0.37% fail on Mounting
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.74% fail on
Macpherson strut
(5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Axles
- 0.37% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.37% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.37% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.37% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(52% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.8% fail on
Transmission
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Tank
- 0.37% fail on System
-
2.2% fail on
Seats
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Driver's seat
- 1.1% fail on Passenger's seat
-
1.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.74% fail on
Body
- 0.74% fail on Other body component
-
0.37% fail on
Chassis
- 0.37% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.37% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.37% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.37% fail on
Doors
-
0.37% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.37% fail on Door condition
-
0.37% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.37% fail on Door condition
-
0.37% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.37% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.37% fail on Other boot lid component
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.9% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.8% fail on Battery(ies)
- 1.5% fail on Horn
-
2.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.37% fail on Switch
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.74% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.37% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.37% fail on Position lamp
-
0.37% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
4.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
10% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(64% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(79% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
(93% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.37% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.37% fail on Catalytic converter
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
(93% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(79% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Visibility
- 5.9% fail on Wipers
- 4.4% fail on Washers
-
5.1% fail on
Tyres
(140% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.37% fail on Size/type
-
4.0% fail on
Steering
-
2.6% fail on
Steering gear
- 2.6% fail on Steering rack
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.74% fail on Track rod end
- 0.74% fail on Steering arm (16 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Steering gear
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.37% fail on Attachment
- 0.37% fail on Requirements
- 0.37% fail on Condition
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.74% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.74% fail on Registration plates
-
0.37% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.37% fail on Attachment