Volkswagen Passat MOT Results
Registered in 199951.3% pass rate
from 898 tests in 2021
(19% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Passat is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(45% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Headlamps
(85% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Headlamp (81% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
5.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
(52% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim (51% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.67% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (87% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.67% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.22% fail on Horn
-
0.78% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.78% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.78% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.78% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.33% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.33% fail on Position lamp
-
0.11% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.11% fail on Switch
-
0.11% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.11% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
6.9% fail on
Headlamps
(85% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
12% fail on
Suspension arms
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(59% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Linkage
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
1.1% fail on
Springs
(53% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.1% fail on Coil spring
- 0.11% fail on Mounting
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.56% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.33% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.45% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.45% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (91% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Axles
- 0.22% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.22% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.22% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.22% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.11% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
-
12% fail on
Suspension arms
(180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
8.7% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.22% fail on Joints
-
8.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Front passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Hinge
-
0.33% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.33% fail on Door condition
-
1.3% fail on
Other passenger's door
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (61% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Body
- 0.22% fail on Other body component
- 0.11% fail on Panel
-
0.22% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.22% fail on
Seats
- 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.11% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.11% fail on Bumpers
-
0.11% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.11% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.11% fail on Boot lid condition
-
8.7% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
4.7% fail on
Brake performance
(37% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
-
0.78% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(69% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(68% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(68% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(77% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt
- 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt
- 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
-
2.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 1.0% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.33% fail on Pedal
-
0.33% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.33% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.22% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.11% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.11% fail on Lever
-
4.7% fail on
Brake performance
(37% better than other 1999 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.89% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.89% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.67% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.56% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.45% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.11% fail on Other leaks
-
0.11% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.11% fail on Undertray
-
7.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.0% fail on
Visibility
- 4.8% fail on Wipers
- 2.4% fail on Washers
- 0.22% fail on Bonnet
-
0.11% fail on
View to rear
- 0.11% fail on Mirrors
-
6.8% fail on
Steering
(83% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Drag link end
-
1.0% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.0% fail on Steering rack
-
0.11% fail on
Power steering
- 0.11% fail on Operation
-
5.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
(160% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Tyres
(43% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 0.45% fail on Size/type
-
4.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Seat belts
(83% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Requirements
- 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.33% fail on
Airbags
- 0.33% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.45% fail on Registration plates
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Attachment