Volkswagen Jetta MOT Results

Registered in 2010
72.7% pass rate
from 902 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Jetta is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Front lamps (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.67% fail on Headlamps (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Stop lamp (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.11% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.11% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.11% fail on Lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Horn
  • 11% fail on Suspension (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Coil springs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Location (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.00% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.33% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.22% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.22% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.11% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.9% fail on Brakes
    • 2.3% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.67% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on ABS
    • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
  • 2.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.67% fail on Washers (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
  • 0.67% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.44% fail on Doors
      • 0.33% fail on Passengers other (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.22% fail on Body condition
  • 0.55% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.22% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.11% fail on Emissions
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on System
    • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.44% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.22% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.22% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
  • 0.22% fail on Steering (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering system
      • 0.11% fail on Free play
        • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.11% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages