Volkswagen Golf MOT Results
Registered in 199954.2% pass rate
from 5,119 tests in 2021
(12% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Golf is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(53% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Pins and bushes (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
- 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover (59% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.039% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
4.6% fail on
Springs
(93% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Mounting
- 0.039% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
4.6% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(29% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.23% fail on Linkage
- 0.098% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.098% fail on Linkage ball joints (89% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.020% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (60% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.70% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.68% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.51% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.27% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (72% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint
-
0.31% fail on
Axles
- 0.25% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.059% fail on Axle
-
0.29% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.078% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.059% fail on Ball joint
- 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.039% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(53% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.2% fail on Stop lamp (43% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(21% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (20% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
(19% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp (22% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.64% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.039% fail on Switch
-
2.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.66% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.31% fail on Horn
- 0.059% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.020% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.33% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.33% fail on Position lamp (95% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.16% fail on Switch
-
0.098% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.059% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.059% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.039% fail on Rear reflectors
-
15% fail on
Brakes
(15% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(57% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.039% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
3.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
- 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.039% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.039% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.020% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.020% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
(41% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
(40% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (45% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.020% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.059% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.039% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.020% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.020% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
(40% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(65% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(66% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance (61% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.039% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.84% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(66% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(57% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(58% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(47% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads (47% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Brake linings
-
1.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(79% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Brake discs (83% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Cable
- 0.16% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(47% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(88% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (98% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Electronic stability control (84% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (35% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Flexible brake hoses (73% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(88% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.31% fail on Pedal
- 0.12% fail on Hand lever
-
0.37% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.37% fail on Lever
-
0.20% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Servos (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.020% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.020% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.020% fail on Other components
-
8.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(28% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(29% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(28% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (37% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.25% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.21% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.020% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.020% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.020% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.21% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (59% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.37% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (92% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.039% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.020% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.020% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.039% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.020% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.020% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
9.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(28% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.61% fail on Engine oil leaks (61% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.039% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.039% fail on Other leaks
-
0.020% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.020% fail on Sound deadening material
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(29% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.5% fail on
Transmission
-
2.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.3% fail on Joints
- 0.078% fail on Drive shaft (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.059% fail on Joints
- 0.020% fail on Halfshafts
-
2.4% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.1% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Other passenger's door
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Catch
-
0.43% fail on
Front passenger's door
(190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Door condition (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Catch
-
0.23% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.21% fail on Door condition
- 0.020% fail on Catch
-
1.5% fail on
Other passenger's door
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(64% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (63% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.020% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.020% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.49% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.39% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.059% fail on Pipe
- 0.039% fail on Tank
-
0.39% fail on
Body
- 0.25% fail on Other body component
- 0.14% fail on Panel
-
0.27% fail on
Chassis
(77% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Chassis condition (77% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Seats
- 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.059% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.078% fail on Bumpers
- 0.078% fail on Undertray (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.059% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.059% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.059% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.020% fail on Floor
-
8.6% fail on
Visibility
(16% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Wipers (26% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Washers
-
0.45% fail on
View to rear
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Mirrors (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Condition of glass
(170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Windscreen (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Bonnet
- 0.078% fail on Driver's view (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
(49% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth (83% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Size/type
-
5.6% fail on
Steering
(52% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(50% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Track rod end (59% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Drag link end
-
0.059% fail on
Other components
- 0.059% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.020% fail on Steering arm
- 0.020% fail on Locking devices
-
1.7% fail on
Steering gear
(62% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Steering rack (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Operation
-
0.61% fail on
Power steering
- 0.29% fail on Other components (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Operation
- 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.039% fail on Pump
-
0.43% fail on
Steering play
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.020% fail on Steering wheel
-
3.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(50% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(34% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts
(26% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (40% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Airbags
- 0.078% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.020% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.78% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.78% fail on Registration plates
-
0.39% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
- 0.078% fail on Condition
- 0.020% fail on Hubs
-
0.020% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.020% fail on Belt(s)/padding