Volkswagen Fox MOT Results
Registered in 200858.4% pass rate
from 5,262 tests in 2017
(13% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Fox is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(14% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (25% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Stop lamp (45% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
(37% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp (40% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (38 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.057% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.057% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Switch
- 0.019% fail on Dipswitch
-
3.6% fail on
Position lamps
(27% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Front lamps (21% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Rear lamps (55% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.095% fail on All position lamps
-
2.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(51% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
(51% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Individual lamps (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.25% fail on Side repeaters (53% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Switch
-
2.7% fail on
Flashing type
(51% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.59% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.11% fail on Tell tale (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Switch
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Horn
- 0.057% fail on Battery (79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
19% fail on
Suspension
(42% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Condition
-
5.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.038% fail on Drive shafts
-
5.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(62% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (67% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (89% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Linkage condition
-
3.4% fail on
Coil springs
(32% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Condition (34% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Location (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 1.0% fail on Front suspension joints (64% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Wheel bearings
(59% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Rear
- 0.076% fail on Front (74% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Bonded suspension
(4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.095% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.095% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.076% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.076% fail on Condition
-
0.076% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.057% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.019% fail on Attachment
-
0.057% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.057% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.038% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.038% fail on Component mounting
-
0.019% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.019% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.019% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.019% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.019% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.019% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(180% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(65% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Wipers (53% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Windscreen
- 0.32% fail on Mirrors
- 0.019% fail on Bonnet
-
6.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.076% fail on
Fuel system
(70% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Cap
- 0.019% fail on System
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
(29% better than other 2008 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth (46% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Size/type
- 0.057% fail on Valve stem
-
5.2% fail on
Brakes
(35% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Brake performance
(33% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Front wheels
- 0.99% fail on Rear wheels (43% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance (62% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.019% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.6% fail on
Hub components
(49% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads (42% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Brake discs (74% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Brake drums (25 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
0.65% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.65% fail on Condition
-
0.53% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(30 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Components
(37 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Servos (51 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Leaks (32 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Components
(37 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Components
(73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Hoses
- 0.13% fail on Servos (42 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Pipes
- 0.019% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.057% fail on Leaks
- 0.019% fail on Operation
-
0.32% fail on
Components
(73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on ABS (69% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.019% fail on Electronic stability system
-
2.4% fail on
Brake performance
(33% better than other 2008 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Steering
(35% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Steering system
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Track rod end (68% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Steering rack
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.076% fail on Steering arm
- 0.019% fail on Drag link end
-
0.36% fail on
Power steering
(140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Electronic power steering (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.076% fail on Operation
- 0.057% fail on Other components
- 0.019% fail on Rams
- 0.038% fail on Steering operation
-
0.019% fail on
Steering control
- 0.019% fail on Steering column
-
0.63% fail on
Steering system
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.21% fail on
Doors
- 0.076% fail on Drivers
- 0.076% fail on Passengers front
- 0.076% fail on Passengers other
- 0.11% fail on Body condition
-
0.076% fail on
Seats
- 0.076% fail on Passengers
-
0.057% fail on
Load security
- 0.057% fail on Bootlid (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Speedometer
-
0.21% fail on
Doors
-
0.42% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(57% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.19% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (61% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.19% fail on
Seat belts
(53% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Condition
- 0.038% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.019% fail on Requirements
- 0.019% fail on Attachment
-
0.23% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(57% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.32% fail on Registration plate
-
0.19% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volkswagen Fox (2006 - 2012)
More substantial than a Lupo. High seats. Roomy cabin seats four comfortably. Cheap.