Volkswagen Fox MOT Results
Registered in 200853.0% pass rate
from 5,337 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Fox is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Suspension
(17% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Springs
-
6.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 6.5% fail on Coil spring
- 0.094% fail on Mounting
- 0.019% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
6.6% fail on
Coil springs
-
6.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(29% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint
- 0.075% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.037% fail on Suspension arm (82% better than other 2008 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(39% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
- 0.075% fail on Linkage
- 0.019% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.019% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.58% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.54% fail on
Other suspension component
(79% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint
- 0.037% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.019% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.17% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.056% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.056% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.037% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.17% fail on
Sub-frames
(62% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.056% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.019% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.075% fail on
Axles
- 0.037% fail on Axle
- 0.037% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (79% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (89% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.037% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.019% fail on Pins and bushes
-
6.6% fail on
Springs
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(34% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Headlamps
(67% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Headlamp (70% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 5.2% fail on Stop lamp (35% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(31% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (28% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (71% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Direction indicators
(82% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
(83% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Side repeaters (54% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.21% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.9% fail on
Flashing type
(83% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.66% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.66% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.66% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.24% fail on
Electrical equipment
(53% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.075% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.075% fail on Horn (71% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.21% fail on Position lamp
- 0.019% fail on Switch
-
0.094% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Main beam tell-tale (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.037% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.037% fail on Switch
-
0.019% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.019% fail on Reversing lamps
-
6.0% fail on
Headlamps
(67% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
13% fail on
Visibility
(100% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Wipers (91% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
View to rear
- 0.30% fail on Mirrors
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet
-
0.11% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.11% fail on Windscreen
- 0.019% fail on Driver's view
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(100% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.24% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.24% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.15% fail on Tank (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.019% fail on Hose
- 0.19% fail on Bumpers
-
0.15% fail on
Body
- 0.15% fail on Other body component
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
(66% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.056% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.056% fail on Door condition
-
0.037% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.037% fail on Door condition
-
0.037% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.037% fail on Door condition
-
0.056% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.13% fail on
Seats
- 0.094% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.037% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.094% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.075% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.019% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.019% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.019% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.019% fail on
Chassis
- 0.019% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.019% fail on
Cabs
- 0.019% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.019% fail on Undertray
-
7.0% fail on
Transmission
(160% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
10% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(88% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(98% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(170% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (42% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.43% fail on
Compression ignition
(73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.037% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.037% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.037% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.019% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.019% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
9.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(170% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Fluid leaks
(74% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Engine oil leaks (69% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.037% fail on Sound deadening material
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(98% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Brakes
(32% better than other 2008 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Brake performance
(25% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (24% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.075% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.037% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.037% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.019% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.019% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
-
1.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(130% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.019% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.019% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(130% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(48% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (46% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.60% fail on
Parking brake performance
(45% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt
(46% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance (48% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.019% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.037% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.019% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.019% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.56% fail on
Rbt
(46% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Brake performance not tested (82% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(63% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Brake pads (56% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Brake linings
-
0.24% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(80% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Brake discs (80% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.056% fail on Lever
- 0.037% fail on Cable
-
0.97% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.67% fail on Lever (72% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(64% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Hand lever (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Pedal
-
0.43% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(18 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Leaks (28 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.056% fail on Servos (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up (22 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Valves (105 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(59% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Anti-lock braking system (52% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.17% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.15% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.094% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.019% fail on Servos
- 0.019% fail on Master cylinder
- 0.019% fail on Valves
- 0.11% fail on Rigid brake pipes (92% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.019% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.019% fail on Other components
-
4.0% fail on
Brake performance
(25% better than other 2008 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Tyres
(22% better than other 2008 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 2.4% fail on Tread depth (35% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Size/type
-
2.9% fail on
Steering
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(30% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end (33% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
- 0.019% fail on Drag link end
- 0.019% fail on Steering arm
- 0.019% fail on Locking devices
-
0.81% fail on
Power steering
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Pump
-
0.41% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.39% fail on Steering rack
- 0.019% fail on Operation
- 0.30% fail on Electronic power steering (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Steering play
- 0.094% fail on Steering rack
- 0.019% fail on Steering wheel
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(30% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(62% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Seat belts
(53% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Requirements
- 0.26% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Seat belts
(53% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.52% fail on Registration plates
-
0.28% fail on
Road Wheels
(47% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Attachment (58% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.019% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.019% fail on
Doors
- 0.019% fail on Emergency exits
-
0.019% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Volkswagen Fox (2006 - 2012)
More substantial than a Lupo. High seats. Roomy cabin seats four comfortably. Cheap.