MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Volkswagen » Eos » 2010

Volkswagen Eos MOT Results

Registered in 2010
70.4% pass rate
from 2,364 tests in 2020
(15% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Eos is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Suspension (26% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Springs (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Coil springs (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.1% fail on Coil spring (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joints (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Suspension arms (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.085% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.042% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.042% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.042% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.042% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.042% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.042% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 7.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.042% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.042% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.68% fail on Electrical equipment (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Horn (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.042% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.42% fail on Position lamps (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Position lamp (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.25% fail on Stop lamp (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.085% fail on Switch
    • 0.085% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.085% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Condition (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.085% fail on Size/type
  • 4.1% fail on Brakes (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (31% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.97% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.042% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.042% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.89% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.042% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.34% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (71% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.042% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (54% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.085% fail on Lever
        • 0.042% fail on Cable
    • 0.085% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.042% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.042% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.042% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 2.5% fail on Visibility (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.085% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.085% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.085% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.76% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.042% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.042% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.51% fail on Compression ignition (58% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.085% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.085% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve (57 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.042% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.085% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.085% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.89% fail on Body, chassis, structure (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Transmission (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Drive shafts (55% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Joints (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
    • 0.085% fail on Exhaust system (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.085% fail on Pipe
    • 0.042% fail on Body
      • 0.042% fail on Other body component
    • 0.042% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.042% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.72% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.63% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.042% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.042% fail on Attachment
    • 0.042% fail on Airbags
      • 0.042% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.30% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment
    • 0.042% fail on Condition
  • 0.17% fail on Steering (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering linkage components (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.042% fail on Electronic power steering
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages