MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Volkswagen » Eos » 2010

Volkswagen Eos MOT Results

Registered in 2010
73.1% pass rate
from 2,000 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Eos is unusually good or bad.

  • 10.0% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (25% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Front lamps (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Switch
    • 0.80% fail on Headlamps (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Horn
    • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.050% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.050% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.050% fail on Switch
    • 0.10% fail on Stop lamp (96% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Battery
  • 9.6% fail on Suspension
    • 5.4% fail on Coil springs (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Condition (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Location
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Condition (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Suspension arms (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 0.25% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.20% fail on Rear
      • 0.050% fail on Front
    • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Front drive shafts (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Constant velocity joints (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.050% fail on Condition
      • 0.050% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.050% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.050% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.050% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.050% fail on Condition
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Condition
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
    • 0.050% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.1% fail on Brakes (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.55% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.050% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.050% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.050% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.15% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.15% fail on ABS
    • 0.050% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.050% fail on Components
        • 0.050% fail on Pipes
  • 2.1% fail on Driver's view of the road (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Wipers (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Washers (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Windscreen
  • 0.70% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.70% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.050% fail on Condition
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 0.050% fail on Condition
  • 0.30% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Emissions
    • 0.050% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.050% fail on System
    • 0.050% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.25% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.10% fail on Steering (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Steering system
      • 0.050% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.050% fail on Power steering
      • 0.050% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.10% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.050% fail on Body condition
    • 0.050% fail on Doors
      • 0.050% fail on Passengers front
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages