Volkswagen Corrado MOT Results
Registered in 199561.8% pass rate
from 469 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Corrado is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
9.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(66% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Components
(71% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Pipes
- 2.8% fail on Hoses
- 1.7% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.64% fail on Operation
- 0.43% fail on Leaks
- 0.21% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
9.0% fail on
Components
(71% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.4% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.6% fail on Front wheels
- 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.64% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 5.5% fail on ABS (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Hub components
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.43% fail on Brake discs
- 0.21% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.21% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.64% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.64% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.21% fail on
Pedal
- 0.21% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.21% fail on
Pedal
-
0.21% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.21% fail on Cable
-
9.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(66% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp
- 0.21% fail on Dipswitch
-
3.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.0% fail on Front lamps
- 0.43% fail on Rear lamps
- 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.85% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (56% better than other 1995 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.21% fail on Tell tale
- 0.21% fail on Switch
- 1.1% fail on Battery
- 0.85% fail on Horn
- 0.64% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.64% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.43% fail on Switch
- 0.21% fail on Lamp
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
5.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
(200% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Front
-
2.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
(56% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Component mounting (62% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Subframe mounting
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
-
2.6% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
2.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.85% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.43% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
-
1.3% fail on
Macpherson strut
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.85% fail on Condition
- 0.64% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.43% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.43% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.21% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.21% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.21% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
-
5.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
(200% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.4% fail on Emissions
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.43% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.43% fail on Pipe
-
6.2% fail on
Steering
-
4.9% fail on
Steering system
- 4.1% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
- 0.64% fail on Operation
- 0.21% fail on Drive system
- 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.21% fail on Other components
- 0.43% fail on Steering operation
-
0.21% fail on
Steering control
- 0.21% fail on Steering column
-
4.9% fail on
Steering system
-
6.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
-
2.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(62% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Doors
- 0.21% fail on Drivers
- 0.21% fail on Passengers front
- 0.21% fail on Passengers other
- 0.43% fail on Speedometer (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.43% fail on Chassis
- 0.43% fail on Body condition (85% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Seats
- 0.21% fail on Drivers
-
0.64% fail on
Doors
-
1.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(70% better than other 1995 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(71% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (66% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.21% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(71% better than other 1995 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate
-
0.21% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Attachment