MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Volkswagen » Corrado » 1995

Volkswagen Corrado MOT Results

Registered in 1995
61.8% pass rate
from 469 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Corrado is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 9.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (66% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Components (71% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Pipes
        • 2.8% fail on Hoses
        • 1.7% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.64% fail on Operation
      • 0.43% fail on Leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 8.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.64% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.5% fail on ABS (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.43% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.21% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.21% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.64% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
        • 0.21% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.21% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.21% fail on Cable
  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.21% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.43% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.85% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (56% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Battery
    • 0.85% fail on Horn
    • 0.64% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.64% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.43% fail on Switch
      • 0.21% fail on Lamp
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 5.1% fail on Wheel bearings (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front
    • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas (56% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Component mounting (62% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
    • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.85% fail on Condition
    • 0.64% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.43% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.21% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.21% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.21% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
  • 8.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Emissions
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Pipe
  • 6.2% fail on Steering
    • 4.9% fail on Steering system
      • 4.1% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 0.64% fail on Operation
      • 0.21% fail on Drive system
      • 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
    • 0.43% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.21% fail on Steering control
      • 0.21% fail on Steering column
  • 6.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (62% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.43% fail on Speedometer (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.43% fail on Chassis
    • 0.43% fail on Body condition (85% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers
  • 1.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (70% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts (71% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (66% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.21% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages