Volkswagen Corrado MOT Results

Registered in 1995

69.6% pass rate

from 404 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Corrado is unusually good or bad.

14% fail on Brakes
- 8.7% fail on Brake performance
  - 3.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.0% fail on Rbt
      - 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.25% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.25% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 3.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.99% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.99% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.99% fail on Rbt
      - 0.74% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 0.74% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 3.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake control
  - 1.2% fail on Lever
- 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 0.99% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.99% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.25% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.25% fail on Brake discs
- 0.99% fail on Load sensing valves (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  - 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.25% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.25% fail on Hand lever
- 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.25% fail on Valves
13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.5% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.5% fail on Headlamp
- 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.0% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.74% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.74% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.50% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.25% fail on Horn
- 0.50% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.50% fail on Switch
- 0.50% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
  - 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.25% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.25% fail on Position lamp
8.9% fail on Suspension
- 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.2% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.99% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.74% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.50% fail on Suspension arm
  - 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.50% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  - 0.50% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.25% fail on Linkage
  - 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.99% fail on Springs
  - 0.99% fail on Coil springs
    - 0.99% fail on Coil spring
- 0.99% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.50% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.50% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.25% fail on Sub-frame
  - 0.25% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
4.7% fail on Visibility
- 4.2% fail on Wipers
- 0.25% fail on View to rear
  - 0.25% fail on Mirrors
- 0.25% fail on Washers
4.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 4.7% fail on Spark ignition
    - 4.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.25% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.25% fail on Catalytic converter
  - 0.25% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.25% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.25% fail on Catalytic converter
3.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (62% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.99% fail on Chassis
  - 0.99% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.99% fail on Transmission
  - 0.99% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.99% fail on Joints
- 0.74% fail on Exhaust system (75% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Doors
  - 0.25% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.25% fail on Door condition
3.0% fail on Steering
- 2.0% fail on Steering gear
  - 2.0% fail on Steering rack
- 0.99% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.74% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.25% fail on Ball joint
- 0.25% fail on Power steering
  - 0.25% fail on Other components
- 0.25% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.25% fail on Steering play
  - 0.25% fail on Steering rack
0.99% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (71% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.25% fail on Condition
0.99% fail on Tyres
- 0.74% fail on Tread depth
- 0.25% fail on Condition
0.25% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.25% fail on Attachment