Volkswagen Corrado MOT Results

Registered in 1995

66.7% pass rate

from 466 tests in 2020

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Corrado is unusually good or bad.

14% fail on Brakes
- 6.7% fail on Brake performance
  - 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.6% fail on Rbt
      - 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.64% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 2.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.64% fail on Service brake performance
  - 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 1.3% fail on Rbt
      - 0.86% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.43% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 3.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 3.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Load sensing valves (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 0.64% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.64% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.43% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.43% fail on Lever (18 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.21% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.21% fail on Brake pads
- 0.86% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.64% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.43% fail on Hand lever
  - 0.21% fail on Pedal
- 0.43% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.43% fail on Lever
- 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.21% fail on Master cylinder
13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.9% fail on Headlamps
  - 3.6% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.21% fail on Dipswitch
- 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.9% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.86% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.64% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.43% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 1.9% fail on Horn
  - 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring
- 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Position lamps
  - 1.1% fail on Position lamp
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.21% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.21% fail on Switch
11% fail on Suspension
- 3.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.86% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.86% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.64% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.21% fail on Linkage
- 0.86% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.64% fail on Springs
  - 0.64% fail on Coil springs
    - 0.64% fail on Coil spring
- 0.43% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.21% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.21% fail on Axles
  - 0.21% fail on Axle
- 0.21% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.21% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.21% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
6.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (40% better than other 1995 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Transmission
  - 2.1% fail on Drive shafts
    - 2.1% fail on Joints
    - 0.21% fail on Drive shaft
  - 0.21% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.21% fail on Joints
- 1.9% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Front passenger's door (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    - 1.3% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 0.64% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.64% fail on Door condition
- 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.86% fail on Exhaust system (77% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Chassis
  - 0.43% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.43% fail on Body
  - 0.43% fail on Other body component
- 0.21% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.21% fail on Engine mounting condition
6.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 4.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 4.9% fail on Spark ignition
    - 3.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.64% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    - 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.21% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.21% fail on Catalytic converter
- 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
5.2% fail on Steering
- 3.2% fail on Steering gear (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
  - 3.2% fail on Steering rack (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 1.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.43% fail on Steering column (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Power steering
  - 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.21% fail on Steering wheel
4.9% fail on Visibility
- 4.1% fail on Wipers
- 0.86% fail on Washers (74% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.21% fail on Windscreen
1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (67% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Seat belts (63% better than other 1995 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
1.1% fail on Tyres (72% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on Tread depth
0.64% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.64% fail on Registration plates
0.21% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Attachment