Volkswagen Corrado MOT Results

Registered in 1992
58.0% pass rate
from 224 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Corrado is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.45% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.45% fail on Switch
    • 3.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.7% fail on Horn
      • 1.8% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.45% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.45% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.45% fail on Switch
    • 0.45% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 18% fail on Brakes (51% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (99% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.89% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.45% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.89% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.8% fail on Load sensing valves (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal
      • 0.45% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.3% fail on Valves (24 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.3% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.89% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.89% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.45% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.45% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.89% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.89% fail on Lever
    • 0.45% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.45% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.45% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 4.9% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Macpherson strut (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (15 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.89% fail on Springs
      • 0.89% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.45% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.45% fail on Mounting
    • 0.45% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.45% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.45% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.45% fail on Driver's view
  • 8.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.89% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.45% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.45% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.45% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.45% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.89% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.89% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 7.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission
      • 3.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.6% fail on Joints
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.89% fail on Chassis
      • 0.89% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.45% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.45% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.45% fail on Body
      • 0.45% fail on Panel
    • 0.45% fail on Doors
      • 0.45% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.45% fail on Door condition
  • 5.4% fail on Steering
    • 4.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.2% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.45% fail on Steering play
      • 0.45% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.89% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.89% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages