Volkswagen CC MOT Results

Registered in 2016
86.3% pass rate
from 2,314 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen CC is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.3% fail on Tyres (50% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (63% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.043% fail on Size/type
    • 0.043% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 2.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.82% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.61% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.086% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.52% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.52% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.48% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.043% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.086% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.086% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.086% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.086% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.086% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.086% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.086% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.043% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.043% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.043% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.043% fail on Horn
  • 2.6% fail on Visibility
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (82% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Wipers (61% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.086% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.086% fail on View to rear
      • 0.086% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.9% fail on Suspension (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.043% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 1.4% fail on Brakes
    • 0.99% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.69% fail on Brake linings and pads (47% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Brake pads (46% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.35% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.48% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.043% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.086% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.086% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.043% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.043% fail on Rbt (sp)
  • 0.52% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.52% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.48% fail on Compression ignition (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.043% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 0.26% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.26% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.086% fail on Body
      • 0.086% fail on Other body component
    • 0.043% fail on Bumpers
  • 0.086% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.086% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages