Vauxhall Zafira MOT Results
Registered in 199943.3% pass rate
from 1,121 tests in 2017
(16% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Zafira is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(14% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Stop lamp (51% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.8% fail on Front lamps
- 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.18% fail on Switch
-
3.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(96% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Fog lamp (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Tell tale
- 0.18% fail on Switch
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.45% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.27% fail on Tell tales (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.089% fail on Switch
-
0.089% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.089% fail on Switch
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Battery (99% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Horn
- 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.18% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.089% fail on Lamp
- 0.089% fail on Switch
- 0.089% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
27% fail on
Brakes
(54% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(56% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 10% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Rear wheels (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Front wheels
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.71% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Components
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 12% fail on Pipes (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Hoses
- 1.2% fail on Valves (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.98% fail on Leaks
- 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.18% fail on Operation
-
14% fail on
Components
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Hub components
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 0.089% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.4% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on ABS
- 0.45% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.45% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.45% fail on Cable
- 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.089% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.089% fail on
Pedal
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
0.089% fail on
Pedal
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(56% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
24% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 18% fail on Emissions (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Exhaust system (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.80% fail on Cap
- 0.27% fail on Pipe
- 0.089% fail on Hose
- 0.089% fail on System
-
23% fail on
Suspension
-
9.5% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Location (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(85% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (90% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.36% fail on Attachment
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
2.8% fail on
Shock absorbers
(77% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Condition (77% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.089% fail on Condition
- 0.089% fail on Attachment
-
2.1% fail on
Prescribed areas
(66% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Component mounting (76% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.089% fail on Spring mounting
-
1.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(62% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(61% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (61% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(61% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.54% fail on Front
- 0.36% fail on Rear (69% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.36% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.27% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
0.089% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
0.089% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
9.5% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(27% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Wipers
- 5.1% fail on Washers (44% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Mirrors (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Windscreen
- 0.089% fail on Bonnet
-
12% fail on
Tyres
(41% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Tread depth
- 5.2% fail on Condition (46% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Size/type (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Valve stem
-
5.3% fail on
Steering
-
4.2% fail on
Steering system
- 3.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.45% fail on Steering rack
- 0.36% fail on Ball joint
-
0.18% fail on
Free play
- 0.18% fail on Steering rack
- 0.18% fail on Drag link end
- 0.089% fail on Steering arm
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.089% fail on Pump
- 0.089% fail on Rams
- 0.089% fail on Steering operation
-
4.2% fail on
Steering system
-
3.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(39% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (66% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Requirements
-
1.4% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.089% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
- 0.089% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(37% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Body condition (61% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Doors
- 0.62% fail on Passengers other
- 0.36% fail on Engine mountings (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Seats
- 0.18% fail on Drivers
- 0.089% fail on Passengers
- 0.27% fail on Spare wheel (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Speedometer (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Vehicle structure
(85% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Chassis (85% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.089% fail on
Load security
- 0.089% fail on Tailgate
-
1.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate
-
0.36% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.36% fail on Attachment
-
0.089% fail on
Towbars
- 0.089% fail on Towbar