Vauxhall Vectra MOT Results

Registered in 1999
52.8% pass rate
from 2,028 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Vectra is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (91% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Headlamp aim (25% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp (34% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.20% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.049% fail on Switch
    • 1.8% fail on Battery (63% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.3% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.25% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.049% fail on Switch
    • 0.049% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.049% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.049% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.049% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.049% fail on Switch
    • 0.049% fail on Horn
    • 0.049% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 9.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (45% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Components (50% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Pipes (95% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Hoses
        • 0.049% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.64% fail on Leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.049% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 7.8% fail on Brake performance (18% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (28% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Front wheels (41% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.79% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.7% fail on ABS (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components (38% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (43% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.049% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.89% fail on Mechanical components (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage
    • 0.20% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
        • 0.15% fail on Condition
        • 0.049% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.099% fail on Restricted movement
  • 18% fail on Suspension (14% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (63% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (73% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage condition
    • 4.9% fail on Coil springs (76% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Condition (80% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Location
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms (33% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (30% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas (61% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Component mounting (63% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Subframe mounting (53% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts (47% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Front drive shafts (46% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (47% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Couplings
    • 0.84% fail on Macpherson strut (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Front suspension joints (67% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings (79% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Front
      • 0.049% fail on Rear
    • 0.39% fail on Shock absorbers (75% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition (75% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.25% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.099% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.099% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.099% fail on Sub-frames (79% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
    • 0.049% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.049% fail on Condition
    • 0.049% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.049% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.6% fail on Emissions
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on Tank
      • 0.35% fail on Pipe
      • 0.35% fail on Cap
      • 0.20% fail on Hose
      • 0.099% fail on System
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres
    • 7.1% fail on Tread depth (45% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
    • 0.049% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.54% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.35% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
      • 0.20% fail on Requirements
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
    • 1.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.049% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.3% fail on Steering (49% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering system (67% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.54% fail on Track rod end (76% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.099% fail on Free play
        • 0.099% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.049% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.89% fail on Power steering
      • 0.39% fail on Other components
      • 0.35% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.15% fail on Rams (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Operation
    • 0.30% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 1.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (57% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Body condition (54% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Vehicle structure (54% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Chassis (54% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.049% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.15% fail on Speedometer (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Engine mountings
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 0.049% fail on Condition
  • 0.049% fail on Towbars
    • 0.049% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages