Vauxhall Tigra MOT Results
Registered in 200449.1% pass rate
from 996 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Tigra is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Suspension
(36% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(78% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (99% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.10% fail on Condition
-
9.6% fail on
Coil springs
(99% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Condition (98% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Location
-
6.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(75% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (77% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(75% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
- 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.30% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.30% fail on Condition
-
0.20% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.20% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
0.20% fail on
Wheel bearings
(88% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Front
-
0.20% fail on
Shock absorbers
(86% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.10% fail on Condition
-
0.10% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(78% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
4.6% fail on
Direction indicators
(48% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Flashing type
(48% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
- 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.50% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.30% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Flashing type
(48% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (33% better than other 2004 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.10% fail on Switch
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2004 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Position lamps
(39% better than other 2004 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Front lamps (36% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Rear lamps
- 2.6% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(89% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Fog lamp (94% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (58% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Horn
-
0.30% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.20% fail on Lamp
- 0.10% fail on Switch
- 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.6% fail on
Direction indicators
(48% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.4% fail on Front wheels
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.10% fail on Brake operation
-
6.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.9% fail on
Components
- 4.9% fail on Pipes
- 1.5% fail on Hoses
- 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.10% fail on Leaks
-
5.9% fail on
Components
-
5.7% fail on
Hub components
(67% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Brake pads (76% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
- 0.30% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
0.70% fail on
Service brake control components
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.60% fail on ABS
- 0.20% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.10% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.10% fail on Cable
-
0.10% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.10% fail on
Components
- 0.10% fail on Servos
-
0.10% fail on
Components
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Tyres
(45% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Condition (96% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.50% fail on Size/type
-
10% fail on
Steering
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Steering system
(100% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Track rod end (94% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Free play
(8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Steering rack (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Steering rack
- 0.10% fail on Drag link end
- 0.40% fail on Prescribed areas (23 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Steering control
-
0.20% fail on
Steering coupling
(9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Universal joint (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Steering shaft
-
0.20% fail on
Steering coupling
(9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Steering operation
-
0.10% fail on
Power steering
- 0.10% fail on Operation
- 0.10% fail on Locking devices
-
8.9% fail on
Steering system
(100% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.8% fail on Wipers
- 4.5% fail on Washers
- 0.20% fail on Windscreen
- 0.20% fail on Mirrors
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.6% fail on Emissions
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.80% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Cap
- 0.10% fail on Pipe
- 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.50% fail on
Doors
- 0.20% fail on Drivers
- 0.20% fail on Passengers front
- 0.10% fail on Passengers other
-
0.50% fail on
Load security
(12 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Bootlid (20 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Tailgate
-
0.20% fail on
Seats
- 0.20% fail on Passengers
- 0.20% fail on Drivers
- 0.10% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.10% fail on Body condition
-
0.50% fail on
Doors
-
0.90% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.90% fail on Registration plate
-
0.50% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(83% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Seat belts
(79% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Condition
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
-
0.20% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(87% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.20% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (86% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Seat belts
(79% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Vauxhall Tigra (2004 - 2009)
Folding tin-top version of the Corsa with a quite sporty drive and softish ride.