MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Vauxhall » Signum » 2005

Vauxhall Signum MOT Results

Registered in 2005
52.8% pass rate
from 608 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Signum is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 8.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage
    • 7.9% fail on Springs (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Coil springs (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 7.9% fail on Coil spring (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.66% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.66% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.49% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.33% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (82% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 18% fail on Brakes (36% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.33% fail on Plate brake tester (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.33% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.66% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.66% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
    • 7.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.82% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.49% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.49% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.49% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.33% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.4% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.49% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.49% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.49% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 9.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system (77% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Transmission
      • 3.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.6% fail on Joints
      • 0.16% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.16% fail on Joints
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
      • 0.16% fail on Pipe
      • 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.33% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.33% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Chassis
      • 0.16% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.16% fail on Load security
      • 0.16% fail on Loading door
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.16% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.16% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.16% fail on Undertray
  • 8.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.16% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.99% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.49% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.49% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.66% fail on View to rear
      • 0.66% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.49% fail on Steering play
      • 0.49% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.33% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering
      • 0.33% fail on Other components
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.99% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
    • 0.33% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Airbags
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.49% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.49% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.16% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Vauxhall Signum (2003 - 2008)
    Plushly equipped alternative to an executive saloon. Versatile rear seating, stacks of room and some decent engines. Cheap to buy.

    Search Good Garages