Vauxhall Rascal MOT Results

Registered in 1992
54.2% pass rate
from 59 tests in 2020
(22% worse than other 1992 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Rascal is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (79% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 14% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 10% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 14% fail on Service brake imbalance (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (36% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 8.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim (78% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim (90% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Electrical equipment (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Horn (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (13% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 12% fail on Suspension (10% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (100% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Leaf springs (55 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (111 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 10% fail on Visibility (57% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Washers (0.26% better than other 1992 cars)
  • 8.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (13% better than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Hose
      • 1.7% fail on Pipe
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.7% fail on Body
      • 1.7% fail on Panel
    • 1.7% fail on Doors
      • 1.7% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.7% fail on Door condition
  • 8.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 6.8% fail on Steering (47% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Steering gear (200% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components (52% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Drag link end
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres (94% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Size/type
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages