Vauxhall Omega MOT Results

Registered in 2002
65.1% pass rate
from 578 tests in 2021
(22% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Omega is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (25% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.52% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (52% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.87% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.87% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.35% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.35% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.35% fail on Stop lamp (93% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 11% fail on Suspension (35% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Springs
      • 2.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.1% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint (85% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (66% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.87% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.87% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 7.8% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance (76% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (69% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Service brake performance (83% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt (83% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake performance (87% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt
          • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.69% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.69% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.17% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.17% fail on Leaks
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.17% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.17% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 7.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 3.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.17% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.17% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.69% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.52% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 6.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (36% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.35% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.17% fail on Pipe
      • 0.17% fail on System
    • 0.35% fail on Seats
      • 0.35% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.17% fail on Body
      • 0.17% fail on Other body component
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
    • 0.17% fail on Cabs
      • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.17% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.17% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.0% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.35% fail on Intermediate drop arm (32 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Other components (22 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Steering linkage (35 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.17% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.35% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.35% fail on Steering box (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (71% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
      • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.17% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages