Vauxhall Omega MOT Results
Registered in 200265.1% pass rate
from 578 tests in 2021
(22% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Omega is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(25% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.52% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
(52% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.6% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.87% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.87% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.35% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.35% fail on Position lamp
- 0.35% fail on Stop lamp (93% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(35% better than other 2002 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Springs
-
2.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.1% fail on Coil spring
-
2.1% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(62% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.35% fail on Ball joint (85% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(66% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
- 0.87% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.87% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.17% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
-
7.8% fail on
Brakes
(45% better than other 2002 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.9% fail on
Brake performance
(76% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(69% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (67% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Service brake performance
(83% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Service brake performance (87% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.52% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.52% fail on
Rbt
- 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.52% fail on
Rbt
- 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(69% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.69% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.69% fail on Brake pads
-
0.69% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.69% fail on Brake discs
-
0.69% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.17% fail on Hand lever
-
0.17% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.17% fail on Leaks
-
0.17% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.17% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.17% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
7.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.1% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 3.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.17% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.17% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
7.1% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.69% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.52% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.17% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
7.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(36% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.6% fail on
Chassis
- 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.35% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Pipe
- 0.17% fail on System
-
0.35% fail on
Seats
- 0.35% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.17% fail on
Body
- 0.17% fail on Other body component
-
0.17% fail on
Doors
-
0.17% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.17% fail on Door condition
-
0.17% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.17% fail on
Cabs
- 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
-
6.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.17% fail on Size/type
-
5.9% fail on
Visibility
- 3.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers
-
0.17% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.17% fail on Windscreen
-
4.0% fail on
Steering
-
3.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.35% fail on Intermediate drop arm (32 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Other components
(22 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Steering linkage (35 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Drag link end
- 0.17% fail on Locking devices
-
0.35% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.35% fail on Steering box (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(71% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.52% fail on Condition
- 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.17% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.87% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.52% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.52% fail on Registration plates
-
0.17% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Attachment