Vauxhall Omega MOT Results

Registered in 2000
54.7% pass rate
from 622 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Omega is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (23% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.32% fail on Headlamp levelling device (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.16% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (42% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps (55% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Front lamps (53% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (60% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Battery
    • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.16% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.48% fail on Horn
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.4% fail on Prescribed areas (46% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Coil springs
      • 4.5% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Location
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Wheel bearings (75% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Rear
    • 0.32% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Front suspension joints (79% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Air suspension
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.16% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.16% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 7.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.6% fail on Components
        • 6.1% fail on Pipes
        • 0.80% fail on Hoses
        • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.80% fail on Leaks
      • 0.48% fail on Operation
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Front wheels (60% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.16% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.16% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.80% fail on ABS
    • 0.48% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.48% fail on Pedal
        • 0.48% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.32% fail on Cable
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system (58% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Emissions
    • 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.80% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.48% fail on System
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
      • 0.16% fail on Cap
  • 8.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.48% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.80% fail on Size/type
    • 0.16% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 6.6% fail on Steering
    • 5.0% fail on Steering system
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.96% fail on Steering arm (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Free play
        • 0.32% fail on Steering box (28 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.32% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.32% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Steering pivot point (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas (43 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering control
      • 0.16% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.16% fail on Steering operation
  • 3.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition
    • 0.32% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers
  • 2.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (48% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (59% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
    • 0.80% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.80% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.80% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.16% fail on Towbars
    • 0.16% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages