Vauxhall Mokka MOT Results

Registered in 2016
87.2% pass rate
from 41,981 tests in 2020
(8.5% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Mokka is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (23% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Position lamp (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on All position lamps (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.0095% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (71% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (75% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0048% fail on Switch
    • 0.22% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp (53% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0071% fail on Dipswitch (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0048% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (94% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Stop lamp (60% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (64% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Side repeaters (80% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0095% fail on Individual direction indicators (82% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0048% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.0024% fail on Switch
    • 0.057% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.040% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.029% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0071% fail on Horn (85% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0024% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0024% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.038% fail on Daytime running lamps (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Reversing lamps (63% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Reversing lamps (63% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0095% fail on Hazard warning (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0095% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0048% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.0048% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 3.6% fail on Visibility (27% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers (50% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Washers (16% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.040% fail on Condition of glass (52% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Windscreen (51% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on View to rear (61% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Mirrors (60% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0048% fail on Bonnet
  • 1.5% fail on Brakes (28% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (25% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (19% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Brake pads (19% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.091% fail on Brake discs and drums (61% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.091% fail on Brake discs (61% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0048% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0048% fail on Lever
    • 0.35% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake imbalance (55% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0024% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0024% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0024% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0024% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0024% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.083% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.083% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.074% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.074% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.060% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.019% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.0071% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0071% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0048% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0024% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 0.033% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (64% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Pedal
      • 0.012% fail on Hand lever (76% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.021% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.0095% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.024% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.017% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.012% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.017% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0095% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0048% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0048% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.0024% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.0024% fail on Lever
    • 0.0024% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 1.4% fail on Tyres (62% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Tread depth (68% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0095% fail on Size/type (81% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.48% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Springs (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Coil spring (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Suspension arms (58% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint (69% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0095% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Anti-roll bars (58% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.012% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0048% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0024% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.026% fail on Shock absorbers (85% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Wheel bearings (68% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0071% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0048% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.0048% fail on Axles
      • 0.0048% fail on Axle (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0048% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0024% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0024% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0024% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.44% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.41% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.27% fail on Spark ignition (42% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (84% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.021% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.14% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.012% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (74% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0024% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0024% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.0024% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0024% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.033% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.017% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.014% fail on Other leaks (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0024% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.0024% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0024% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 0.44% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (73% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Seat belts (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0024% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.017% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.24% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.13% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.024% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.021% fail on Body
      • 0.019% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0024% fail on Panel
    • 0.019% fail on Transmission (75% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Drive shafts (73% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Joints (73% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Seats
      • 0.0095% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0095% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.012% fail on Doors
      • 0.0095% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0095% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0071% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0071% fail on Door condition
    • 0.0071% fail on Fuel system (74% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0048% fail on System
      • 0.0024% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.0024% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0024% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.0024% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0024% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0024% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0024% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.18% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.18% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.0024% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.074% fail on Steering (41% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.055% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.0048% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.0048% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.0048% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0048% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0048% fail on Steering coupling (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0048% fail on Universal joint (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0024% fail on Steering column
  • 0.040% fail on Road Wheels (72% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Attachment (65% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0071% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0024% fail on Hubs
  • 0.0071% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0071% fail on Anchorages (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Vauxhall Mokka X (2012 - 2019)
    Front wheel drive or four wheel drive. Good rear passenger room. Efficient 1.7 CDTi. 140PS 1.4T is the engine of choice. Mokka X much improved. Very few reports of problems.

    Search Good Garages