Vauxhall Meriva MOT Results
Registered in 201685.4% pass rate
from 6,609 tests in 2021
(15% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Meriva is unusually good or bad.
-
3.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth (32% better than other 2016 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(43% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (47% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.57% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.51% fail on Headlamp
- 0.061% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.20% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.17% fail on
Electrical equipment
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.12% fail on Stop lamp (81% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Direction indicators
(67% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Flashing type
(67% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.12% fail on
Flashing type
(67% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.091% fail on
Position lamps
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Position lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.061% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.061% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.061% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.015% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.015% fail on Switch
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(43% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension
-
2.0% fail on
Springs
(74% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
(75% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Coil spring (75% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Coil springs
(75% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Suspension arms
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Ball joint (69% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.061% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Linkage
- 0.030% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.045% fail on
Axles
- 0.045% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.045% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.030% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.015% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.030% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.015% fail on Wheel bearings
-
2.0% fail on
Springs
(74% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Visibility
(49% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Washers
- 0.97% fail on Wipers (66% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.015% fail on Windscreen
-
0.015% fail on
View to rear
- 0.015% fail on Mirrors
-
1.9% fail on
Brakes
(31% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(40% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(39% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Brake pads (39% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.32% fail on Brake discs
-
0.97% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(39% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.26% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt
- 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt
-
0.12% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.076% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.045% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.12% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.091% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.015% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
- 0.045% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.045% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.045% fail on
Rbt
- 0.045% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.045% fail on
Rbt
-
0.26% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.36% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Electronic stability control (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.030% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.030% fail on Pedal
-
0.030% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.030% fail on Electronic parking brake
- 0.030% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.015% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.015% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.015% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.015% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(40% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(41% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(46% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.091% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Non catalyst emissions (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.091% fail on
Compression ignition
(73% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.015% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
1.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(46% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.26% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.061% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.045% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.015% fail on Pipe
- 0.045% fail on Bumpers
-
0.045% fail on
Doors
-
0.015% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.015% fail on Door condition
-
0.015% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.015% fail on Door condition
-
0.015% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.015% fail on Door condition
-
0.015% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.030% fail on
Engine mounting
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Engine mounting condition (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.015% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.015% fail on Undertray
-
0.39% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.32% fail on
Seat belts
(92% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.076% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.32% fail on
Seat belts
(92% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.091% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.076% fail on Attachment
- 0.015% fail on Condition
-
0.076% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.076% fail on Registration plates
-
0.076% fail on
Steering
(72% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.030% fail on
Power steering
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Operation
- 0.015% fail on Other components
-
0.015% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.015% fail on Steering rack
-
0.015% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.015% fail on Track rod end
- 0.015% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.030% fail on
Power steering
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Vauxhall Meriva (2010 - 2017)
Practical and easy to get in and out of. Facelifted 2014 models get impressive new 1.6-litre CDTi engine.