MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Vauxhall » Meriva » 2010

Vauxhall Meriva MOT Results

Registered in 2010
60.6% pass rate
from 12,939 tests in 2021
(8.2% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Meriva is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension (21% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Springs (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Coil springs (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 9.2% fail on Coil spring (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Mounting
    • 4.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (17% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Ball joint dust cover (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.062% fail on Linkage (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.46% fail on Shock absorbers (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Wheel bearings (37% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Axles
      • 0.22% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.085% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0077% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.046% fail on Macpherson strut (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0077% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.039% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0077% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0077% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp (13% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (16% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.039% fail on Headlamp levelling device (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters (71% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Reversing lamps (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0077% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.40% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.26% fail on Battery(ies) (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Horn
      • 0.0077% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0077% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.32% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (43% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (42% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0077% fail on Switch
    • 0.22% fail on Position lamps (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Position lamp (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0077% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Brakes (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0077% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.054% fail on Cable
        • 0.031% fail on Lever
        • 0.015% fail on Linkage
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance (25% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (30% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (31% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (30% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance (45% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.039% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0077% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0077% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (41% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (38% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0077% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.53% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0077% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0077% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance (36% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (37% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance (31% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0077% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0077% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.023% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.015% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0077% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.0077% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0077% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.34% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.015% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
      • 0.054% fail on Hand lever (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.14% fail on Parking brake control (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Lever (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.085% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.062% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.015% fail on Valves
      • 0.0077% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.077% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.062% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.015% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.015% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.015% fail on Other components
    • 0.0077% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0077% fail on Operation
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Condition (14% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 5.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.17% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.0077% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.077% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.070% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.0077% fail on Window
    • 0.015% fail on Bonnet (89% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.6% fail on Steering (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Steering linkage components (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.046% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.023% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.015% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0077% fail on Other components
        • 0.0077% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.0077% fail on Pump
    • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas (94 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering gear (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering play (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Electronic power steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Steering column (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0077% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0077% fail on Universal joint
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (20% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Spark ignition (81% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Emissions not tested (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.015% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0077% fail on Oxygen sensor
          • 0.0077% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.32% fail on Compression ignition (74% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.039% fail on Emissions not tested (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0077% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.0077% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.015% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0077% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.56% fail on Fluid leaks (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.0077% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.0077% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.023% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.015% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.0077% fail on Undertray
  • 4.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Transmission (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Drive shafts (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Joints (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.023% fail on Joints
      • 0.0077% fail on Belts
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.015% fail on Pipe
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Engine mounting condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Bracket (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Doors
      • 0.085% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.085% fail on Door condition
      • 0.031% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.031% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0077% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0077% fail on Door condition
    • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Sub-frame (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on Sub-frame condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.093% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.070% fail on Body
      • 0.039% fail on Other body component
      • 0.015% fail on Body condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Panel
    • 0.062% fail on Boot lid (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.023% fail on Other boot lid component (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Chassis
      • 0.031% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.031% fail on Seats
      • 0.015% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.015% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.52% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
      • 0.039% fail on Requirements
      • 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.10% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0077% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0077% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.37% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.0077% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages