Vauxhall Meriva MOT Results

Registered in 2010
66.8% pass rate
from 12,583 tests in 2017
(14% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Meriva is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Location
    • 6.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.032% fail on Condition
      • 0.0079% fail on Attachment
    • 0.65% fail on Suspension arms (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Condition
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment
    • 0.22% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Tie bars/rods (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0079% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Drive shafts (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Front drive shafts (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Constant velocity joints (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Condition (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.095% fail on Wheel bearings (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Front (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Rear (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Front suspension joints (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Trailing arms (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.024% fail on Macpherson strut (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.016% fail on Condition
    • 0.0079% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.0079% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.0079% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.0079% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0079% fail on Component mounting
  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Front lamps (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0079% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Individual lamps (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on All direction indicators (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.0079% fail on Switch
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.33% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Battery (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Horn
    • 0.087% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.048% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.040% fail on Lamp
      • 0.0079% fail on Switch
    • 0.024% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.0079% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Condition (20% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth (18% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
    • 0.064% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.0079% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 6.5% fail on Brakes (17% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Components (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Pipes (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.23% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Operation
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.016% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.0079% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.52% fail on Rear wheels (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.079% fail on Brake performance not tested (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0079% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.079% fail on ABS (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.048% fail on Pedal
        • 0.032% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.016% fail on Condition
    • 0.048% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.024% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.024% fail on Air and vacuum systems (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Components (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Pipes (31 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.9% fail on Driver's view of the road (19% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.079% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0079% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 3.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Emissions (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.21% fail on Cap (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0079% fail on System
    • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (26% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering system
      • 0.95% fail on Track rod end (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.040% fail on Steering rack (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Free play
        • 0.024% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.016% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0079% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0079% fail on Other components
        • 0.0079% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.040% fail on Operation
      • 0.040% fail on Pump (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0079% fail on Other components
    • 0.064% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.024% fail on Steering control
      • 0.024% fail on Steering coupling (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Universal joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0079% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.48% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.40% fail on Seat belts (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
      • 0.024% fail on Requirements
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment
    • 0.087% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0079% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
  • 0.33% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.33% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.28% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.10% fail on Body condition
    • 0.079% fail on Engine mountings (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on Doors
      • 0.056% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.016% fail on Drivers
      • 0.0079% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.016% fail on Seats
      • 0.0079% fail on Passengers
      • 0.0079% fail on Drivers
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Attachment (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages