MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Vauxhall » Meriva » 2009

Vauxhall Meriva MOT Results

Registered in 2009
53.0% pass rate
from 8,874 tests in 2020
(28% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Meriva is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp (62% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.023% fail on Headlamp levelling device (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps (40% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Position lamp (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.71% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 0.50% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.37% fail on Battery(ies) (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Horn (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.011% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.25% fail on Reversing lamps (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Reversing lamps (88% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.011% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.011% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.011% fail on Daytime running lamps
  • 18% fail on Suspension (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.045% fail on Linkage (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.023% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.8% fail on Springs (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Coil springs (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.8% fail on Coil spring (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers (52% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (22% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.74% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Sub-frame (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.27% fail on Wheel bearings (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.056% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.011% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.068% fail on Other suspension component (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.056% fail on Macpherson strut (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.034% fail on Axles
      • 0.034% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.023% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Brakes (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (41% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads (42% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.023% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.023% fail on Cable
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance (23% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (33% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (34% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (36% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.034% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.88% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (44% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp) (42% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.66% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Rbt (sp) (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance (43% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (47% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance (44% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.023% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.034% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.034% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.011% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.011% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (41% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.023% fail on Electronic stability control (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.079% fail on Pedal
    • 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Lever (50% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.045% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.023% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.011% fail on Valves
    • 0.068% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.056% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.011% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.023% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.023% fail on Other components
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres (14% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Condition (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.25% fail on Size/type
  • 7.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Transmission (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Drive shafts (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Joints (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.011% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.011% fail on Joints
    • 0.39% fail on Fuel system (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Pipe
    • 0.21% fail on Engine mounting (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Bracket (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.10% fail on Doors
      • 0.056% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.056% fail on Door condition
      • 0.034% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.034% fail on Door condition
      • 0.011% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.011% fail on Door condition
    • 0.056% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.045% fail on Sub-frame (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Sub-frame condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.056% fail on Body
      • 0.034% fail on Other body component
      • 0.023% fail on Panel
    • 0.056% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.034% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.023% fail on Other boot lid component (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.034% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Towbar condition (27 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.023% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.023% fail on Undertray
    • 0.011% fail on Chassis
      • 0.011% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.011% fail on Seats
      • 0.011% fail on Driver's seat
  • 5.8% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.068% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.011% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.011% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.18% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.023% fail on Operation
    • 0.18% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Other components
    • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas (60 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Electronic power steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Steering coupling (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Universal joint (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Steering column (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.011% fail on Steering lock
  • 5.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (43% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.011% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.011% fail on NOx sensor
      • 0.62% fail on Compression ignition (58% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (68% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.079% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.045% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.77% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.011% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.011% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.011% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.011% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.12% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.090% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.090% fail on Windscreen
  • 0.63% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.62% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.011% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.50% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (42% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
      • 0.011% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.10% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Airbags
      • 0.023% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels (42% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages