Vauxhall Meriva MOT Results
Registered in 200344.7% pass rate
from 1,083 tests in 2021
(22% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Meriva is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(50% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(53% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Ball joint
- 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.092% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.092% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
8.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(77% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (77% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Linkage
- 0.28% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
7.0% fail on
Springs
(78% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Coil springs
(81% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Coil spring (80% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Mounting
-
7.0% fail on
Coil springs
(81% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Sub-frames
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Sub-frame (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.65% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.46% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
-
0.37% fail on
Suspension rods
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Ball joint
- 0.28% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (89% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.092% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.092% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
8.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(53% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
20% fail on
Brakes
(44% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 12% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
- 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.55% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
-
3.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.092% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.18% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.18% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
-
1.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.65% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(68% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(82% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Brake pads (79% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Brake linings
-
2.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(93% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Brake discs (95% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.28% fail on Cable
- 0.092% fail on Lever
-
3.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(82% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.83% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.18% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.092% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.37% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.28% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.28% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.18% fail on Pedal
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 7.5% fail on Stop lamp (62% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Flashing type
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.7% fail on
Flashing type
(100% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.65% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.65% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.65% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.65% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.46% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.18% fail on Horn
- 0.092% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.18% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.18% fail on Position lamp
- 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
-
11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(43% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(47% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
(61% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (99% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested (96% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.092% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.092% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
0.46% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.28% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.092% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
10% fail on
Spark ignition
(61% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.28% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.092% fail on Other leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(47% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Visibility
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 4.3% fail on Washers
-
0.37% fail on
View to rear
- 0.37% fail on Mirrors
- 0.18% fail on Bonnet
-
0.092% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.092% fail on Windscreen
-
8.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 5.5% fail on Exhaust system (64% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Transmission
-
2.2% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.2% fail on Joints
-
0.092% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.092% fail on Joints
-
2.2% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.55% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.46% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.092% fail on System
-
0.37% fail on
Doors
-
0.37% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.37% fail on Door condition
-
0.37% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.28% fail on
Chassis
- 0.28% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.18% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(79% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.092% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.092% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.092% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.092% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.18% fail on Bumpers
-
0.092% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.092% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.092% fail on
Seats
- 0.092% fail on Passenger's seat
-
8.7% fail on
Steering
(95% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Track rod end (87% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint
- 0.092% fail on Drag link end
- 0.092% fail on Steering arm
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (52 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.83% fail on Steering rack
- 0.092% fail on Operation
-
0.65% fail on
Steering play
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.092% fail on
Power steering
- 0.092% fail on Operation
- 0.092% fail on Steering column
- 0.092% fail on Electronic power steering
-
6.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(84% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Condition (52% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.37% fail on Size/type
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(55% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Seat belts
(57% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Condition
- 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas (74% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.65% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.74% fail on
Seat belts
(57% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.92% fail on Registration plates
-
0.092% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.092% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Vauxhall Meriva (2003 - 2009)
Roomy, easy-to-drive, five-seat mini MPV. Sliding rear seats fold into the floor. VXR is nearly as quick as a hot hatch.