Vauxhall Insignia MOT Results

Registered in 2016
82.2% pass rate
from 25,019 tests in 2020
(43% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Insignia is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.2% fail on Tyres (46% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth (88% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.096% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.068% fail on Size/type
  • 4.8% fail on Brakes (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on Brake linings (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs and drums (50% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Brake discs (51% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0080% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0080% fail on Cable
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on Plate brake tester (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0080% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.064% fail on Brake performance not tested (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.040% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.0040% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0040% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.024% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.024% fail on Rbt
          • 0.024% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0040% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (66% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Electronic stability control (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Anti-lock braking system (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Flexible brake hoses (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.024% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.012% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.020% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.020% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.016% fail on Parking brake control (84% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.0040% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.0040% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0040% fail on Other components
  • 4.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (27% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.012% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0040% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.0040% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.62% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.0040% fail on Switch
      • 0.0040% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.0040% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.084% fail on Stop lamp (78% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Direction indicators (78% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Flashing type (78% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.048% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.0040% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.040% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.024% fail on Horn
      • 0.0080% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0040% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0040% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.036% fail on Position lamps (79% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Position lamp (83% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0040% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0040% fail on Switch
    • 0.024% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.020% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0040% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.016% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.016% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 3.5% fail on Visibility (23% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers (38% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Washers
    • 0.100% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.088% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.088% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.012% fail on View to rear
      • 0.012% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.024% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.024% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0040% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0040% fail on NOx sensor
      • 0.40% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.0080% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0040% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.020% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.016% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.0040% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.0080% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0080% fail on Undertray
  • 0.67% fail on Suspension
    • 0.36% fail on Springs (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Coil spring (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.072% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0040% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.092% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.036% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0080% fail on Anti-roll bar (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0080% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (32 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0040% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.052% fail on Shock absorbers (71% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.0080% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0040% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.0040% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.0040% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 0.28% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.064% fail on Transmission
      • 0.064% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.064% fail on Joints
    • 0.048% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.040% fail on Body
      • 0.020% fail on Other body component
      • 0.012% fail on Panel
      • 0.0080% fail on Body condition (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.024% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0040% fail on Hose
      • 0.0040% fail on System
    • 0.024% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.024% fail on Undertray (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Seats
      • 0.012% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0040% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.012% fail on Integral vehicle structure (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0080% fail on Strengthening plate (65 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0040% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.012% fail on Towbar (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0080% fail on Other towbar components (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0040% fail on Coupling
    • 0.012% fail on Doors
      • 0.0080% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0080% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0040% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0040% fail on Door condition
    • 0.0080% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0080% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.0040% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0040% fail on Chassis condition
  • 0.21% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.21% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.18% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.088% fail on Seat belts (46% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0040% fail on Requirements
    • 0.080% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.0080% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0080% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.092% fail on Attachment
    • 0.036% fail on Condition
  • 0.032% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Steering linkage components (82% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Electronic power steering (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0040% fail on Power steering
      • 0.0040% fail on Other components
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages