Vauxhall Insignia MOT Results

Registered in 2010
66.7% pass rate
from 28,425 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Insignia is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 8.6% fail on Springs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Coil spring (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.99% fail on Anti-roll bars (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joints (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0070% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.45% fail on Suspension arms (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Suspension arm (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Ball joint dust cover (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.41% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.049% fail on Macpherson strut (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0035% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.025% fail on Other suspension component (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Ball joint (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0035% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0035% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.018% fail on Sub-frames (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.0070% fail on Suspension rods (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0035% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.0035% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0070% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.0035% fail on Axles
      • 0.0035% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.0035% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.0035% fail on Suspension unit
  • 9.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (19% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (18% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.028% fail on Headlamp levelling device (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.011% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (21% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (21% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.060% fail on Side repeaters (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Position lamps (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Position lamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0035% fail on Switch
    • 0.35% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (23% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp (23% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp (23% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Switch
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.25% fail on Horn
      • 0.049% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.042% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.014% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.34% fail on Stop lamp (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.035% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.0070% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0035% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.0035% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.0035% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.0035% fail on All outline marker lamps
  • 8.8% fail on Brakes (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.90% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.89% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.0070% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.053% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.046% fail on Cable
        • 0.0035% fail on Lever
        • 0.0035% fail on Linkage
    • 2.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Electronic stability control (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Electronic braking system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance (28% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.0035% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.025% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.018% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.0070% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.0035% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.19% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (56% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance (64% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.077% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0070% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Rbt (86% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.074% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0070% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.011% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.34% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
      • 0.011% fail on Hand lever (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0070% fail on Servos
      • 0.0035% fail on Valves
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Rigid brake pipes (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Parking brake control (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.018% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
      • 0.0035% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.0070% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0035% fail on Leaks
      • 0.0035% fail on Servos
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres (19% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
    • 0.0035% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility (11% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers (15% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.095% fail on View to rear
      • 0.095% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0035% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.099% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.060% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.011% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.011% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.0070% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition (23% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.091% fail on Emissions not tested (47% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.0035% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0035% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 0.38% fail on Fluid leaks (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Engine oil leaks (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Other leaks (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.032% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.032% fail on Undertray
  • 1.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Exhaust system (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Transmission (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Drive shafts (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.088% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Tank
      • 0.018% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0070% fail on Hose
    • 0.095% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.081% fail on Body
      • 0.053% fail on Other body component
      • 0.021% fail on Panel
      • 0.0070% fail on Body condition
    • 0.074% fail on Undertray
    • 0.049% fail on Doors (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.042% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0035% fail on Catch
      • 0.0070% fail on Front passenger's door (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Door condition (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.039% fail on Boot lid (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.0070% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.028% fail on Seats (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.011% fail on Driver's seat (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.025% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.014% fail on Chassis
      • 0.011% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.0035% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.011% fail on Towbar
      • 0.011% fail on Other towbar components (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0035% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0035% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.0035% fail on Load security
      • 0.0035% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.0035% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.0035% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 0.99% fail on Steering (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.039% fail on Operation
      • 0.032% fail on Rams (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Pump (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Steering gear (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0035% fail on Operation
      • 0.0035% fail on Steering box
    • 0.20% fail on Steering linkage components (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Ball joint (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0070% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.13% fail on Steering wheel (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.011% fail on Steering column
    • 0.0070% fail on Steering play (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Steering rack (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0035% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0035% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.0035% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
    • 0.063% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.28% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Seat belts (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0035% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0035% fail on Pre-tensioners
  • 0.0070% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0035% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.0035% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages