Vauxhall Frontera MOT Results

Registered in 2002
54.0% pass rate
from 567 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Frontera is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (19% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.35% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp (45% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.18% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 0.71% fail on Battery
    • 0.35% fail on Trailer electrical socket (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 22% fail on Brakes (29% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Components (80% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.5% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Reservoirs (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Hoses
        • 0.35% fail on Valves
      • 1.1% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Leaks (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake operation (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.18% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 3.5% fail on Hub components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.88% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.53% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.5% fail on ABS (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 9.7% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.71% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.5% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.71% fail on Spring mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Coil springs (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Location
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.88% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.88% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.18% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
  • 9.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.53% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on System (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions (69% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres (46% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 4.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 3.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.5% fail on Steering system
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.35% fail on Free play
        • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.53% fail on Steering control (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Steering column (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 2.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.4% fail on Body condition
    • 0.18% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.18% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.18% fail on Chassis
  • 0.35% fail on Towbars (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages