Vauxhall Frontera MOT Results
Registered in 199663.7% pass rate
from 91 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Frontera is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt
-
3.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.4% fail on
Service brake performance
- 5.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.1% fail on Load sensing valves
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
4.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
4.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.1% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp
-
1.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.1% fail on Switch
-
1.1% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.1% fail on Switch
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
-
5.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.4% fail on
Fuel system
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Tank (11 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pipe
- 1.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
3.3% fail on
Chassis
- 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
- 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.2% fail on
Transmission
-
2.2% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.2% fail on Joints
-
2.2% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.2% fail on
Body
- 2.2% fail on Other body component (14 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Panel
-
1.1% fail on
Seats
- 1.1% fail on Driver's seat
-
4.4% fail on
Fuel system
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Suspension
- 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.2% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.1% fail on
Springs
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.1% fail on Coil spring
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
1.1% fail on
Other suspension component
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
6.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
6.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 6.6% fail on Prescribed areas
-
6.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
6.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
6.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.4% fail on
Visibility
- 3.3% fail on Washers
- 1.1% fail on Bonnet
- 1.1% fail on Wipers
-
3.3% fail on
Steering
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Intermediate drop arm
-
1.1% fail on
Steering play
- 1.1% fail on Steering box
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.1% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.1% fail on Attachment
-
1.1% fail on
Tyres
- 1.1% fail on Condition